Standards Committee 1 v Hart [2011] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 84 KB]
...There is also of course an interest in the public being aware of the various charge-out rates of practitioners and the reasonableness having regard to experience and expertise. These matters are no longer cloaked in mystery or secrecy. The client care rules of the legal profession provide to the contrary. In addition the Tribunal considers that the public is aware of the presumption of innocence which includes a practitioner facing disciplinary charges and that any publicity can...