LCRO 113/2013 AB v EF (3 August 2017) [pdf, 145 KB]
...AB applied for a review of the Committee’s determination. He said:4 … the decision is deeply flawed in its methodology and … it follows that the Committee’s decision to absolve Mr EF of any and all responsibility for his actions is both careless and null and void. [14] His issue with the methodology would appear to be that the Committee did not direct Mr EF to answer each and every aspect of Mr AB’s complaints and the determination was so unreasonable as to amount to “a d...