Search Results

1. LCRO 7/2018 AB v CD (26 November 2019) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...made by Mr CD, entered an unsatisfactory conduct finding in respect to complaint that Mr AB had failed to provide Mr CD with an itemised account or breakdown of his fees. Background [2] Mr CD instructed Mr AB to defend an application for a final protection order. [3] The application had been made by a former girlfriend of Mr CD’s. [4] The application did not proceed to hearing. [5] Mr AB negotiated a settlement which provided that the temporary protection order that was then i...

2. LCRO 22/2019 HT v MK (29 May 2020) [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...(2) Share sale agreement – preparation – issue (b) (a) Negligence claim (i) Parties’ positions [102] Mr HT says Mr MK was negligent in drafting the share sale agreement which contained “a raft of errors”, in particular (a) no “protective measure[s]” to “ensure” settlement, and (b) the number of sale shares, and option shares.42 He claims he suffered loss as a consequence. 41 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Com...

3. Tapiki and Eru v New Zealand Parole Board [2019] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 403 KB]

   ...with his mother the Special Conditions stipulated that Jesse was to live at her home and not move without the prior written approval of a probation officer. [12] Ms Tapiki explained to the Tribunal that in the lead up to the progress hearing much careful thought and preparation by her and Ms Eru had occurred because given Jesse’s three prior releases and two recalls, they wanted to ensure that this time, with strong family support, he would have a real chance for reintegration into the...

4. BORA Members of Parliament (Pecuniary Interests) Bill [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...unreasonable search and seizure. In our opinion, the search and seizure powers accorded to the Auditor-General are reasonable in terms of section 21, particularly in light of the objectives of the Bill. The Public Audit also provides the following protections: (a) the circumstances in which the Auditor-General’s search and seizure powers may be invoked are limited to the exercise of his or her functions, duties or powers under the Bill; (b) the powers conferred on the Auditor...

5. BORA Health Practitioners (Replacement of Statutory References to Medical Practitioners) Bill [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...• Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992 • Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 Consistency with the Bill of Rights Act Section 21 – Security against unreasonable search and seizure 6. Section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act protects against unreasonable search and seizure. There are two limits to the section 21 right. Section 21 is applicable only in respect of those activities that constitute a "search or seizure", and protects only against those search...

6. Media Protocol 2017 - Youth Courts [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...suppression of these details as they are automatically suppressed. A Judge can never approve publication of these details. These details include: a. The name of the child or young person or the names of the parents or guardians or any person having care of the child or young person. b. The name of any school the child or young person is or was attending. c. Any other name or particulars likely to lead to the identification of the child or young person or of any school that the...

7. 2019 Youth Court Protocol [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...suppression of these details as they are automatically suppressed. A Judge can never approve publication of these details. These details include: a. The name of the child or young person or the names of the parents or guardians or any person having care of the child or young person. b. The name of any school the child or young person is or was attending. c. Any other name or particulars likely to lead to the identification of the child or young person or of any school that the ch...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 096 Northland District Health Board v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 9.7 MB]

   ...acknowledge that the plan has been through an extensive and iterative process and that we are focussed only on the provisions that are before us. Nevertheless, we repeat our earlier comments and other decisions about Te Mana o te Wai and the need to protect not only our waters but our biodiverse ecotones from further loss. [35] Beyond this, the Health Board is particularly concerned at the potential for agrichemicals to affect humans. They note that the Northland population is among...

9. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Schlooz [2021] NZLCDT 12 ( 14 April 2021) [pdf, 400 KB]

   ...different aggravating and mitigating features mean that we cannot accept that the submission made by Mr Judd that a suspension has been reserved for cases of dishonesty or multiple professional failures in dealing with clients. [55] We have given careful analysis to the cases we have been referred to and the principles extracted and relied on by counsel. We consider we have struck the appropriate response having regard to the facts of this case and its comparison with others cited...

10. LCRO 193/2017 AA v BB and CC (29 November 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

    ...misapprehension that he could litigate an employment dispute through the vehicle of a conduct complaint. Secondly, I was concerned that Mr AA was continuing to file extensive information. [45] In that Minute, I noted the following: [8] Having carefully considered the information filed by Mr AA, it is my view that he is labouring under the apprehension that his employment dispute can be litigated through the LCRO. [9] The submissions filed by Mr AA in support of his application are...