LCRO 12/2018 NH and EW v TL and [KT Law] (17 February 2020) [pdf, 102 KB]
...courtesy. [34] It is understandable that Mr NH is disappointed by the fact that the freezing orders did not stop the auction in its tracks. That failing cannot be laid at the feet of Mr TL or the firm. While Mr TL or the firm could have done more to protect Mr NH’s interests, he was not their focus; subject to his overarching obligation to the court, Mr TL and the firm were responsible, and answerable, primarily to the executors. [35] Mr TL was obliged to advise his clients th...