Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Ravelich [2020] NZLCDT 22 (16 July 2020) [pdf, 112 KB]
...both parties. At the penalty hearing Mr Collins had submitted that a period of suspension was required and that even strike-off would not be necessarily too harsh a penalty. [7] Because of the subsequent discussion between the parties and the careful plan for support, counselling, monitoring and mentoring devised by Mr Ravelich, his counsel and the New Zealand Law Society representatives, it is not necessary to address all of the matters set out in the earlier penalty submissions....