Search Results

1. 2021-10-15 PC8 - Hearing Notice [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Auckland...

2. 2022-03-02 Hearing Notice - PC8 (Urban Provisions) - Commencing Monday 21 March 2022 - updated [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Auckland...

3. 2022-03-01 PC8 (Urban) Hearing Notice - further updated [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Auckland...

4. Sharma v Manchanda [2018] NZIACDT 2 (2 February 2018) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...complaint was made, the Registrar required that Mr Manchanda provide a copy of his file, but he did not provide file notes that he later relied on. [3] The essential features of the grounds of complaint are, Mr Manchanda failed to take adequate care over the absent police certificate, did not give adequate advice and failed to follow up advice in writing, and he failed to provide the Registrar with a full copy of his file. [4] The essential facts are not contentious, though what w...

5. Tonks v Stone [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...to be correctly flashed with matching profile roofing material. All the very awkward flashing of rounded junctions between walls and roofs and skylights and the like need to be flashed by an experienced plumber as considerable thought and care is required to ensure weathertightness at these difficult points. Conventional flashing materials will not be able to effect weathertightness due to the curved shapes of the walls and roof skylight and the trapedoizial-section roofing....

6. [2022] NZIACDT 10 - BC v Lawlor (18 May 2022) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...bundle of support documents. It concerned Mr Lawlor’s work for the father. The following heads of complaint against him are referred to the Tribunal: Negligence, or alternatively breach of the specified provisions of the Code (1) Failure to take care filing a PGVV for the father when he was not eligible, in breach of cl 1. (2) Failure to file a s 61 request in a timely manner and failure to acknowledge his role in the delay, in breach of cl 1. (3) Failure to have a written agr...

7. DA v EB LCRO 7/2013 (26 August 2014) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...paid it into a trust account, as she has since accepted she should have done. By thwarting the operation of Regulation 9, Ms DA cannot be said to have breached it. While that is a logical outcome, it is not satisfactory in that it side-steps the protections Regulation 9 provides to lawyers’ clients. [77] The Committee was also correct to find that Ms DA had breached Regulation 10, which makes provision for fees and disbursements to be paid in advance of a practitioner renderin...

8. [2022] NZIACDT 29 - EQ v McCarthy (19 December 2022) [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...Immigration NZ to Mr McCarthy on 6 succeeded only once, speaking to him on 14 October 2021. He told the officer he would reply to their emails that day, but he did not do so. [32] On 4 November 2021, Immigration NZ wrote to the complainant, care of Mr McCarthy, stating that the mandatory character information was missing. The government agency said it had sought to contact Mr McCarthy numerous times between 23 July and 28 October 2021, but he did not respond. They were given...

9. Johnson v Canterbury/Westland Standards Committee 3 - Outcome of appeal of decisions [2018] NZLCDT 5 and [2018] NZLCDT 21 [pdf, 439 KB]

   JOHNSON v CANTERBURY/WESTLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 3 [2019] NZHC 619 [28 March 2019] IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE CIV 2018-404-000533 [2019] NZHC 619 BETWEEN RONALD BRUCE JOHNSON Appellant AND CANTERBURY/WESTLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 3 Respondent Hearing: 29 August 2018 Appearances: P J Napier & N Pye for Appellant S Waalkens & M Mor

10. LCRO 170/2019 ZY v LN QC (23 April 2021) [pdf, 279 KB]

    ...(a) the decision to file enforcement proceedings and the interlocutory application were tactical procedural steps, the filing of which did not reflect any competency failings on the part of Mr LN; and (b) it considered that Mr LN had made a careful assessment of the options available to Ms ZY; and 1 Ms ZY, submissions accompanying review application (8 November 2019) at p5. 5 (c) it was unable to identify evidence to suggest that Mr LN had acted incompetently; and (d)...