F Ltd v DS & KS [2022] NZDT 173 (10 October 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]
...responsible to pay the vet bills. Therefore, F Ltd now brings a claim for a refund of the $9,541.55 paid. 3. DS and KS counterclaim $3,099.22 being the cost of additional vet bills. 4. The issues to be decided are: a) Did FQ breach its duty of care by hitting Noah, while on the property of DS and KS? Did the negligence of the painter cause injury to Noah? Did DS and KS have appropriate control of Noah while the painters were at the property? b) Is FQ entitled to a refund of the $9,...