IJ v K U Ltd [2020] NZDT 1549 (10 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]
...with [Council] rules and required remediation. She claims $10,401.00. 2. Both parties provided significant volumes of documentary evidence. 3. The issues I must decide are: a. Was K & U Ltd’s work completed with reasonable skill and care and fit for purpose? b. If not, did K & U Ltd refuse or neglect to remedy the failure(s) and/or is the failure one of a substantial character? c. Are the costs claimed reasonable? Was K & U Ltd’s work completed with r...