LCRO 68/2018 TY v HG (29 November 2019) [pdf, 220 KB]
...issues: (a) what duties, if any, did Mr HG owe to Mr TY, [EEE] and their clients; (b) did Mr HG breach any of those duties? [24] The Committee was satisfied that in the circumstances Mr HG’s duty was to his clients and that he had no duty to protect or promote the interests of [EEE] or its clients. [25] However, it considered that the obligation all lawyers owe to the Court not to mislead or deceive it,4 should extend to quasi-judicial processes such as those of the Commerce C...