Search Results

1. Julian v Inia - Succession to Moehuarahi Te Ruuri (2024) 322 Waiariki MB 32 (322 WAR 32) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...(2024) 322 Waiariki MB 32 (322 WAR 32) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP-20230000024870 A20210015426 WĀHANGA Under Sections 3A and 4 Family Protection Act 1955 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Moehuarahi Te Ruuri I WAENGA I A Between TUI KUIAKAHA JULIAN Te Kaitono Tuatahi First Applicant AP-20230000021564 ME And JOAN...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 049 Haines House Haulage Northland v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...application were not subject to Plan appeals, nor to any major changes through the mediation process. This relates in particular to RPE Objectives 1.2.1, .2, .3 and Policies 1.3.1 and 1.3.5. However, there has been the addition of a new Policy 1A to protect identified elements of the zone's distinctive rural character and amenity. [7] During the course of this hearing, the relevant Plan provisions were approved by the Court, and in any event all parties agreed these provisions co...

3. Scope of inquiry Minute October 2021 [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...necessary to preserve such confidentiality, the inquiry must be held, in whole or in part, in private. In addition, the RCOI was required to restrict access to inquiry information where it considered it necessary to do so for reasons including protecting New Zealand’s security or defence interests, protecting the identity of witnesses or other persons, avoiding prejudice to the maintenance of the law, and ensuring protection of fair trial rights. The RCOI was expressly prohibited...

4. [2023] NZREADT 20 - CAC 2107 v Sheldon (Penalty) (14 August 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...may be made on and subject to any terms and conditions that the Committee thinks fit. [10] In determining the appropriate penalty, it is relevant to note the purpose of the Act: 3 Purpose of Act (1) The purpose of this Act is to promote and protect the interests of consumers in respect of transactions that relate to real estate and to promote public confidence in the performance of real estate agency work. (2) The Act achieves its purpose by— (a) regulating agents, branch manag...

5. Canterbury Standards Committee v X [2011] NZLCDT 19 [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...not a fit and proper person to be a legal practitioner. The respondent’s position [8] For the respondent, it was submitted by his counsel that striking off would not be an appropriate response, as it was not necessary to do that to protect the public. This matter was said to be one episode in a largely unblemished career, 4 arising from a serious error of judgment at a time when the respondent was said to be adversely affected by mental health issues. Accordingly, it w...

6. BORA Freedom Camping Bill [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...residents and costs for local authorities and the Department of Conservation. 4. The Bill achieves its purpose by creating an infringement regime in relation to freedom camping on local authority controlled and public conservation land, in order to protect the environment, health and safety and access to public places and sites of significance for public enjoyment. It allows for camping to generally be permitted unless restricted or prohibited either through local government bylaws or th...

7. INZ (Gilray) v Croxson [2019] NZIACDT 79 (9 December 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...there was no lack of probity on his part 2 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 7(1). 4 nor was the quality of his own work (finalising and filing the applications) substandard or lacking in care. [16] Mr Croxson was also found to have failed to enter into written service agreements with the two clients and to have failed to personally provide and explain to them a summary of his responsibilities, the Code, his complaints proce...

8. BORA Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Bill [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...21. 3.2 The Bill provides for a number of offences for failure to comply with various obligations without reasonable excuse (clauses 104, 105, 108 and 109), thereby placing an evidential onus on the accused, contrary to the presumption of innocence protected by s 25(c). 3.3 The Bill provides for a civil pecuniary penalty in respect of civil liability acts (clause 88). As this penalty is similar to other penalties in the Bill that are expressed as criminal, it raises the issue as to whet...

9. [2020] NZIACDT 33 - RV v Aiolupotea (27 July 2020) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...material discussions, in breach of cl 26(c); and (3) failed to provide the full client file to the Authority, in breach of cl 26(e). (4) failed to respond to the letter of 8 March 2018, thereby being unprofessional and lacking diligence and due care, in breach of cl 1; and (5) failed to inform the complainant of the decline of his visa application or provide advice regarding his unlawful status, thereby being unprofessional, in breach of cl 1. 4 [15] Furthermore, Mr Aiolupote...

10. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - list of issues 6th report [pdf, 51 KB]

    ...situation, including new measures and developments relating to the implementation of the Covenant 1. Please provide detailed information on any significant developments in the legal and institutional framework within which human rights are promoted and protected at the national level that have taken place since the previous periodic report, including any relevant case law. Please also provide information on measures adopted to disseminate the Covenant among judges, lawyers and prosecuto...