Canterbury Standards Committee v X [2011] NZLCDT 19 [pdf, 125 KB]
...not a fit and proper person to be a legal practitioner. The respondent’s position [8] For the respondent, it was submitted by his counsel that striking off would not be an appropriate response, as it was not necessary to do that to protect the public. This matter was said to be one episode in a largely unblemished career, 4 arising from a serious error of judgment at a time when the respondent was said to be adversely affected by mental health issues. Accordingly, it w...