Search Results

1. Cameron v Hastings District Council [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...Because the claimants were relying on the WHRS assessor, Mr Phayer, on technical matters and because of the agreement during the course of the hearing to which I shall refer, I considered that their interests on technical matters was adequately protected by Mr Phayer's presence. 3.4 There was no appearance at that hearing of or on behalf of the first respondent. A notice of withdrawal of the claim against it signed on behalf of the claimants and the first respondents and...

2. 2021 07 23 Record of PHC PC8 Timetable Directions [pdf, 404 KB]

   ...Mt Aspiring Station Ltd New Zealand Pork Industry Board Ngāi Tahu Ki Murihiku North Otago Irrigation Company Limited NZ Deer Farmers Assoc. Otago Fish and Game Council and the Central South Island Fish and Game Council Pomahaka Water Care Group Springwater AG Limited William Thompson Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu Dairy Holdings North Otago Irrigation Mt Aspiring Wai Wanaka No No No Yes – agree to abide by position reach...

3. Restorative justice: Practice resources for family violence cases 2019 [docx, 6.8 MB]

   ...evidence-based risk factors · the adult victim’s assessment of the risk[footnoteRef:1] [1: This risk assessment work is largely drawn from the Western Australian Common Risk Assessment and Risk Management Framework (2nd ed.), Department for Child Protection and Family Support (2015). Perth, Western Australia: Western Australian Government.] [bookmark: _Hlk12959850]Case file no: Date: 1. Risk and lethality factor identification Factors marked with an asterisk (*) indicate an increa...

4. Julian v Inia - Succession to Moehuarahi Te Ruuri (2024) 322 Waiariki MB 32 (322 WAR 32) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...(2024) 322 Waiariki MB 32 (322 WAR 32) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP-20230000024870 A20210015426 WĀHANGA Under Sections 3A and 4 Family Protection Act 1955 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Moehuarahi Te Ruuri I WAENGA I A Between TUI KUIAKAHA JULIAN Te Kaitono Tuatahi First Applicant AP-20230000021564 ME And JOAN...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 049 Haines House Haulage Northland v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...application were not subject to Plan appeals, nor to any major changes through the mediation process. This relates in particular to RPE Objectives 1.2.1, .2, .3 and Policies 1.3.1 and 1.3.5. However, there has been the addition of a new Policy 1A to protect identified elements of the zone's distinctive rural character and amenity. [7] During the course of this hearing, the relevant Plan provisions were approved by the Court, and in any event all parties agreed these provisions co...

6. Godinich v Guan Thye Heng Co Ltd [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...cladding has been removed, I think that it is probable that the remedial work will be restricted to a reconstruction of the top of the balustrade. There are a number of different ways of waterproofing the top, but all will involve installing a protective capping along the full length of the balustrade and ensuring proper junctions with the external walls of the house. I would accept the costings provided by Mr Jordan as being reasonable, and would set the cost of the remedial wo...

7. Trustees Executors Ltd as trustee for the Simpson Family Trust v Wellington City Council [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...on the architect’s plans. [5] The Simpsons believed that the contract was: • to prepare working drawings, • supervise the construction project, and • manage the whole process acting as their agent and ensuring their interests were protected. [6] The nature of the contract was disputed by Mrs O’Callaghan who says, inter alia, that the Simpsons were not willing to pay for supervision of the contract. [7] Mrs O’Callaghan drew plans from the architect’s sket...

8. Holland & Ors as Trustees of the Harbourview Trust v Auckland City Council [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...consented plans also had stamped on them the requirement that the cavity between the backing and the building Page 17 of 44 paper was to be sealed from the roof space and the subfloor and opened at the bottom to drain moisture to the outside but protected against the entry of vermin. [45] I accept that the lack of an adequate drainage plane or the sealing of the drainage plane has contributed to the damage resulting from water ingress. The responsibility for this defect...

9. Scope of inquiry Minute October 2021 [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...necessary to preserve such confidentiality, the inquiry must be held, in whole or in part, in private. In addition, the RCOI was required to restrict access to inquiry information where it considered it necessary to do so for reasons including protecting New Zealand’s security or defence interests, protecting the identity of witnesses or other persons, avoiding prejudice to the maintenance of the law, and ensuring protection of fair trial rights. The RCOI was expressly prohibited...

10. [2023] NZREADT 20 - CAC 2107 v Sheldon (Penalty) (14 August 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...may be made on and subject to any terms and conditions that the Committee thinks fit. [10] In determining the appropriate penalty, it is relevant to note the purpose of the Act: 3 Purpose of Act (1) The purpose of this Act is to promote and protect the interests of consumers in respect of transactions that relate to real estate and to promote public confidence in the performance of real estate agency work. (2) The Act achieves its purpose by— (a) regulating agents, branch manag...