Search Results

1. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Application for Interim Non-Publication Orders) [2019] NZHRRT 52 [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...2019) Whether IDEA Services breached HIPC: • Rule 6 • Rule 8 HRRT041/18 Amended statement of claim (15 February 2019) Whether IDEA Services breached the Code: • Right 4(1) (right to have health services provided with reasonable care and skill) • Right 4(2) (right to have health services provided that comply with legal, professional, ethical, and other relevant standards). THE APPLICATION FOR INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS [3] By application dated 19 November...

2. RIS: Strengthening the Family Court [pdf, 4.8 MB]

   ...the Minister of Justice appointed a Panel to review the 2014 reforms that relate to assisting parents/guardians to resolve disputes about parenting or guardianship matters. The Panel was asked to focus on the effectiveness of the 2014 reforms in protecting the interests of children when resolving disputes about their care or contact, and in achieving safe, timely and durable outcomes for them. The Panel consulted extensively in developing their report. Those most intimately affected by...

3. [2025] NZREADT 45 - Montagna v REAA (3 November 2025) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...and salespersons: (b) raising industry standards: (c) providing accountability through a disciplinary process that is independent, transparent, and effective. [29] The focus of professional disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but the protection of the public:2 … It is well established that professional disciplinary proceedings are civil and not criminal in nature. That is because the purpose of statutory disciplinary proceedings for various occupations is not to punish...

4. Tully v Yerman [2012] NZIACDT 39 (31 July 2012) [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...ensure appropriate standards of conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned.” [17] The statutory purpose is achieved by considering at least four factors which materially bear upon maintaining appropriate standards of conduct: [17.1] Protecting the public: Section 3 of the Act states “The purpose of this Act is to promote and protect the interests of consumers receiving immigration advice ...” [17.2] Demanding minimum standards of conduct: Dentice v Valuers Registration B...

5. LCRO 13/2015 UP v HQ (19 June 2018) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...to be treated equally with our shareholders and he gave us no advice whatsoever during this process”. [34] It was not Mr HQ’s role to promote the interests of Mr and Mrs UP or provide them with advice. He was acting for Mr and Mrs WB. Protection of confidential information [35] All information within Mr HQ’s knowledge relating to matters involving the UPs and the WBs, was information known to all parties. There was no potential for Mr HQ to breach any duty of confidentia...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 157 Service and Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota Inc v Terranova Homes and Care Ltd [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...writing suggests that this reflects historical and structural gender discrimination. We were 9 A submission echoed by Business New Zealand. 10 Referred to in Human Rights Commission Caring Counts, Tautiaki Tika: Report of the Inquiry into the Aged Care Workforce (May 2012) at 52, citing a NZACA salary survey. referred to a report of the Human Rights Commission, Caring Counts, Tautiaki Tika, which followed an in...

7. KN & TK v V Ltd [2025] NZDT 107 (20 March 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...the development by V Ltd create a private nuisance and cause the water damage to KN and TK’s property? 3. There is not enough evidence to support a finding that V Ltd’s development has created a nuisance. 4. An action for private nuisance protects a person’s right to the use or enjoyment of an interest in land. A nuisance arises when a landowner does something on their land which interferes with an adjoining landowner’s right to enjoy their land. The interference with use and...

8. Kelly v Tall Poppies Education Limited [2024] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 339 KB]

   (1) INTERIM ORDER PREVENTING PUBLICATION OF THE PLAINTIFF’S NAME ADDRESS AND ANY OTHER IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS. (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON. DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 1 This decision is to be cited as Kelly v Tall Poppies Education Limited [2024] NZHRRT 54. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 54 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 051/2022 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 199

9. Govind v Chandra [2019] NZIACDT 8 (19 February 2019) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...immigration advice, and to enhance the reputation of New Zealand as a migration destination, by providing for the regulation of persons who give immigration advice. [10] The focus of professional disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but the protection of the public:3 It is well established that professional disciplinary proceedings are civil and not criminal in nature. That is because the purpose of statutory disciplinary proceedings for various occupations is not to punish th...

10. 2014 archive

    ...lead providers’ regulatory responsibilities have not changed – they’ll continue to be responsible for the quality of supervised providers’ work, regardless of the level of supervision. We wish to thank respondents for your insights. They were carefully considered in shaping the final policy. Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 Legal Aid Services is changing the way it assesses applications for legal aid in proceedings under the Protection of Personal and Property Rights...

    Located in:

    1. About >
    2. Lawyers & service providers >
    3. Legal aid lawyers >
    4. Whats New for lawyers providing Legal Aid