BC v BQ [2024] NZDT 390 (5 June 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]
...point up until full payment was made. There was also no dispute and I accept that when she requested a refund after camp after BQ had collected [the horse], that no refund was given, so prima facie BQ was in breach. 16. Despite this the law of bailment also applies. This requires that persons who are in possession of another’s property must take reasonable care of it. 17. In this case, the property in [the horse] had not yet passed to BC. This is evident by the pre- purchase leas...