CU v XG [2015] NZDT 782 (28 May 2015) [pdf, 106 KB]
...despite the prior proceedings in the READT? [4] In July 2013, CU made a complaint to the Complaints Assessment Committee (CAC) of the Real Estate Agents Authority. In April 2014, the CAC decided that no action was warranted. CU appealed to the READT. In December 2014, the READT issued a decision in which it found that XG was in breach of the rules governing the conduct of licensees for failing to disclose that piles were in need of repair. However, it declined to aw...