Search Results

1. Federated-Farmers-of-New-Zealand.pdf [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...the purposes of section 308C or 308CA of the Resource Management Act 1991. Federated Farmers is interested in all of the proceedings. 1. Federated Farmers represents farmers in the Waikato and Waipā Rivers Catchment. 2. Federated Farmers has appealed the decision to on Proposed Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1 – Waikato and Waipā River Catchments (“PC1”), as amended by the Hearing Panel, in its entirety, i.e. the decision as it relates to the introduction and all o...

2. Federated Farmers of New Zealand.pdf [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...the purposes of section 308C or 308CA of the Resource Management Act 1991. Federated Farmers is interested in all of the proceedings. 1. Federated Farmers represents farmers in the Waikato and Waipā Rivers Catchment. 2. Federated Farmers has appealed the decision to on Proposed Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1 – Waikato and Waipā River Catchments (“PC1”), as amended by the Hearing Panel, in its entirety, i.e. the decision as it relates to the introduction and all o...

3. Greyling v Gimranov [2016] NZIACDT 55 (15 September 2016) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...both for knowingly offending, or a fine of up to $100,000 if the knowledge 4 element is absent. The courts have treated the offending as having a gravity that reflects the range of penalties. In Hakaoro v R [2014] NZCA 310 the Court of Appeal dealt with an appeal against a sentence of one year and eight months’ imprisonment on charges under the Act. Mr Hakaoro’s appeal was unsuccessful, as was his application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. 1 [15] If a lice...

4. Webster v Takarangi - Ngarara West B3B (2007) 195 Aotea MB 127 (195 AOT 127) [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...renl, purchase money, royallies, or olher proceeds of Ihe alienation of land, or of any compensalioll payable in respecl of other revenue derived from Ihe land, affected by allY order to which all applicaliollullder sectioll 45 of this Act or all appeallt/lller Part 2 of tit is Act relates. (2) Notwithstanding anYlhing illihe Crown Proceedings Acl 1950, any ilYlInclion lIIade by the Court under this section may be expressed to be binding on the Miiori Trustee. (3) Any ilYlInction lIIad...

5. [2020] NZEmpC 114 Ikundabose v McWatt Group Ltd [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...Cross Campus Board of Trustees [2017] NZEmpC 4, [2017] ERNZ 1. 6 See Yong (t/a Yong & Co Chartered Accountants) v Chin [2008] ERNZ 1 (EmpC) at [3]. miscarriage of justice.7 The applicable principles were discussed by the Court of Appeal in Ports of Auckland v NZ Waterfront Workers Union.8 As the Court of Appeal confirmed, the mere possibility of a miscarriage of justice is not a sufficient ground for granting a rehearing.9 What is required is an actual miscarriage of...

6. LCRO 6/2022 ZED Limited v RK (21 February 2022) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...scope of review [42] The nature and scope of a review was discussed by the High Court in 2012, which said of the process of review under the Act:11 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for...

7. [2021] NZACC 118 - Baker v ACC (3 August 2021) [pdf, 313 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 118 ACR 137/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN HARLEY BAKER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 21 June 2021 Heard at: Auckland/Tamaki Makaurau Appearances: Mr D Heperi, advocate for the appellant Ms F Becroft for the res...

8. 23 June 2022 JC Panel decision (Suppression) redacted [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...any court or tribunal, the starting point when it comes to questions of suppression is the principle of open justice. The importance of the principle of open justice has been discussed at length in case law. [15] In R v Liddell, the Court of Appeal said:9 [T]he starting point must always be the importance in a democracy of freedom of speech, open judicial proceedings, and the right of the media to report the latter fairly and accurately as “surrogates of the public”. [16] I...

9. [2021] NZACC 129 - Griffiths v ACC (05 August 2021) [pdf, 300 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 129 ACR 068/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NICOLA GRIFFITHS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: Christchurch/Otautahi Heard at: 20 July 2021 Appearances: Ms M Watson advocate for the appellant Mr C Hlavac for the respond...

10. LCRO 32/2022 QP v ZH (28 March 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...considers that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. Nature and scope of review [40] The High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:8 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determination are entitled to a review based on the LCRO’s own opinion rather than on deference to the view of the Committee. A review by the LCRO is informal, inquisitorial and robust....