[2019] NZEmpC 175 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [pdf, 184 KB]
...correct. He argued that the Court should have adopted the figure most favourable to the defendant, 25 per cent, and that this flows from the Court’s finding in Xtreme Dining Ltd v Dewar when it stated:4 A non de novo hearing is in the nature of an appeal. The challenger or plaintiff is required to show that the Authority’s determination was wrong. [7] Mr Cleary went on to refer to the well-known principles of recall in Horowhenua County v Nash (No 2)5 and Saxmere Company Ltd...