Search Results

1. Hansen v CAC 10052 & Sadd [2011] NZREADT 26 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport – Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger – Member Mr G Denley – Member APPEARANCES The appellant in person Mr Clancy for First Respondent Mr Rea for Second Respondent DECISION Introduction [1] This is an appeal by Leonard Roy Hansen (“the appellant”) against the decision of Complaints Assessment Committee 10052 (“the Committee”) to take no further action in respect of the appellant’s complaints against Wendy Sadd (“the licensee”)...

2. [2025] NZSSAA 06 (12 February 2025) [pdf, 197 KB]

   Reference no: SSAA 41/24 [2025] NZSSAA 06 UNDER the Social Security Act 2018 IN THE MATTER of an Appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee. BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Hearing at Auckland on 7 November 2024 Before: T Tran (Deputy Chairperson) P Singh (Member) R Aston (Member) Appearances: XXXX presenting her own appeal...

3. Form 26 - Criminal legal aid -Tax invoice - schedules H & I [pdf, 421 KB]

   ...GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim Date activity/fixed fee completed Final invoice Interim invoice Date of final disposition (if final invoice) Court of Appeal (Schedule H) – Base Fees Schedul...

4. [2020] NZREADT 55 - Motupally v The Real Estate Agents Authority (9 November 2020) [pdf, 240 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 55 READT 038/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PRASHANTH KUMAR MOTUPALLY Applicant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1903) First respondent AND JASON HAYDE & DAVID WELLS Second respondents Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Ms N O’Connor, Member Sub...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 1 Hill v Workforce Development Ltd interlocutory [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...application to join Mr O’Sullivan, advocate for Mrs Hill, as a party for the purposes of determining costs. Neither the application for joinder, nor the application for costs, has been determined. In the interim Mrs Hill has applied for leave to appeal against the substantive judgment. The application for leave has not yet been determined by the Court of Appeal. Mrs Hill seeks orders staying the applications for joinder and for costs pending the outcome of the appeal process....

6. [2022] NZACC 73 – Brown v ACC (3 May 2022) [pdf, 149 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 73 ACR 047/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ANTHONY BROWN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented S Arnold for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 3 May 2022 JUDG...

7. [2007] NZEmpC AC 60A/07 X v Bay of Plenty DHB [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...Roberts submitted, s5(1) of the Interpretation Act 1999 requires the meaning of an enactment to be ascertained from its text and in the light of its purpose. He cited Agnew v Pardington [2006] 2 NZLR 520 at paragraph 32 where the Court of Appeal stated: … there is no doubt that the text of a provision must be interpreted having regard to the Act as a whole and the legal system generally. [15] Mr Robert’s submitted that speedy justice is the Authority’s statutory...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 28 Rossiter v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...Authority considered an application for stay brought by AFFCO. The application was made on the basis that Mr Rossiter’s claim relied on two decisions of this Court, both of which were at the time subject to appellate consideration in the Court of Appeal. [7] The first appealed judgment was a decision of a full Court that Union members such as Mr Rossiter were employees of AFFCO during the off-season and, separately, that AFFCO had unlawfully locked out such employees. 2...

9. [2025] NZEmpC 19 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v NZ Post Ltd [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...second application by New Zealand Post Ltd for a stay of this proceeding and to vacate the hearing scheduled to begin on 24 February 2025. [2] NZ Post’s first application was made when an application to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal in an unrelated judgment, Rasier Operations BV v E Tū Inc, was pending.1 [3] NZ Post’s second application was filed on 14 January 2025 and followed the Supreme Court granting leave to appeal in the Rasier case.2 The first app...

10. [2021] NZREADT 7 - Sharma v Brake (12 February 2021) [pdf, 421 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 07 READT 049/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN VISHAL and MONISHA SHARMA Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1901) First Respondent AND JULIE BRAKE and SUCCESS REALTY LIMITED t/a BAYLEYS ROTORUA Second Respondents READT 001/20 BETWEEN JULIE BRAKE Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE...