Search Results

1. Appeal an Inland Revenue decision

   ...review, you can ask the Family Court for a Departure Order. You can apply for a Departure Order at any time after an administrative review. If someone else asked for a review and Inland Revenue changed the child support you receive, you can appeal the decision in the Family Court. You need to appeal within two months of the decision. On this page: Departure Orders and how to apply Appeal Inland Revenue's decision in Family Court and how to apply Departure Orders A Departur...

   Located in:

   1. Family >
   2. Paternity & Child Support >
   3. Child support

2. ENV-2016-AKL-000203 Frizzell v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.6 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV -2016-AKL- IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) General notes: AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under " [section 156(1)/section 156(3)] of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan) ...

3. 2017 NZSSAA 052 (15 September 2017) [pdf, 238 KB]

   [2017] NZSSAA 052 Reference No. SSA 39, 46, 54, 59, 66, 88 & 134/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by X of Z against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee DATE OF MINUTE Friday, 15 September 2017 DECISION (ON INTERLOCUTORY ISSUES) Overview [1] The appellant lodged these seven appeals during 2016. They are against seven decisions of the Chief Executive; each has been the...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 027 Vortac New Zealand Limited v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...of the retaining wall and all associated structures and materials on the site. The enforcement order was made as a part of the sentence under s 339(5) of the RMA. It was made on 30 January 2020. [3] Both the conviction and the sentence were appealed by Vortac. In its decision in Vortac New Zealand Ltd and others v R [2021] NZCA 200 dated 19 May 2021, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. In relation to the enforcement order, the Court of Appeal said: [57] Notwithstanding t...

5. Moke v Trustees of Ngāti Tarāwhai Iwi Trust [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 265 (2019 APPEAL 265) [pdf, 334 KB]

   2019 Māori Appellate Court MB 265 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20180009039 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an order of the Māori Land Court made on 18 September 2018 at 197 Waiariki MB 141-164 in respect of Ngāti Tarāwhai Iwi Trust BETWEEN EVA MOKE Appellant AND TRUSTEES OF NGĀTI TARĀWHAI IWI TRUST Respondents Hearing: 13 May 201...

6. [2025] NZACC 089 - Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation (4 June 2025) [pdf, 179 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 089 ACAR 53/25 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN WARREN SMITH Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 30 May 2025 Held at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented F Becroft for the Accident Comp...

7. Singh v New Zealand Law Society [2017] NZLCDT 20 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...Police. From the context, this appears to have been an action seeking damages against the Police on behalf of Mr Khan, for malicious prosecution or similar. [16] Following his conviction and sentence of 12 months imprisonment, the appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal of Fiji. The appeal was against both conviction and sentence. The Tribunal has read the full summary of facts recorded in the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Fiji and is satisfied that counsel’s summary a...

8. Smith v ACC [2013] NZACA 7 [pdf, 25 KB]

   BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON [2013] NZACA 7 ACA 2/08 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN M SMITH Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING On the papers AUTHORITY Robyn Bedford COUNSEL A D Barnett for respondent/applicant for order to strike out application for leave to appeal...

9. CAC 301 & 403 v Tucker [2016] NZREADT 37 [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BY REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 301), AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 403) AGAINST GRANT TUCKER Defendant AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GRANT TUCKER Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 403) Respondent Hearing: 3 June 2016 (by teleconference) Tribunal: Hon P J Andr...

10. Ruapuha Uekaha Hapu Trust - Hauturu East 8 (2013) 67 Waikato Maniapoto MB 100 (67 WMN 100)- (PDF, 74KB) [pdf, 74 KB]

    ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20130008522 UNDER Section 59, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hauturu East 8 Block AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to appeal preliminary decision made at 61 Waikato Maniapoto MB 7- 14 on 14 August 2013 RUAPUHA UEKAHA HAPU TRUST Applicant Counsel: Mr J Koning, counsel for Ruapuha Uekaha Hapu Trust Mr K Catran, counsel for Messrs Tane and Mart...