14011 items matching your search terms
...31631884:635775 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY ENV-2016-AKL-000216 IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156 of the LGATPA BETWEEN ZAKARA INVESTMENTS LIMITED Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF INTENTION TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 274 OF THE RESO...
...31631884:635775 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY ENV-2016-AKL-000215 IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156 of the LGATPA BETWEEN MAN O’WAR FARM LIMITED Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF INTENTION TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 274 OF THE RESOUR...
...31631884:635775 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY ENV-2016-AKL-000227 IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156 of the LGATPA BETWEEN KUMEU-HUAPAI RESIDENTS & RATEPAYERS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF INTENTION TO BE PARTY TO PROCE...
IjBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing : IN THE MATTER AND AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC T~ of the Public Works Act 1981 of an appeal under section 24 of the Act of Notices of Requirement under s 174 of the Act PANMURE BRIDGE MARINA LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-5) Other parties as set out in Schedule 1 Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL AUCKLAND TRANSPORT Respondents Environment Judge JA Smith 10 May 2018 -...
Bacon Butty Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 196 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 325(2) of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an application under section 325(3A) of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BACON BUTTY LIMITED (ENV-20240-AKL-182) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey Last case e...
...AT AUCKLAND ENV-2016-AKL-000272 UNDER THE IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Resource Management Act 1991 (nRMAn) and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (nLGATPAn) of an appeal under section 157(1) of the LGATPA of section 274 of the RMA of hearing Topic 074 - Designations ("Topic 074") of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan JAMES CHRISTOPHER MAWSON Appellant AUCKLAND TRANSPORT Respondent NO...
...31631884:635775 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY ENV-2016-AKL-000219 IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156 of the LGATPA BETWEEN HOUGHTON FAMILY TRUST Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF INTENTION TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 274 OF THE RESOURCE MA...
RF&B v DCC IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 79 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act in relation to the Dunedin City District Plan BETWEEN ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-287) Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven En...
[2018] NZSSAA 27 Reference No. SSA 162/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefit Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair C Joe - Member Hearing at Whangarei on 23 May 2018 Appearances XXXX in person; XXXX, his wife, as agent P. Siueva, agent for the Ministry of Social Development INTERIM DECISION – AMENDED...
...AN. DD’s subsequent actions have established that he is not acting in good faith and his complaint is likely to be vexatious. DD filed a separate complaint against AN’s co-worker which I declined on 31 October 2024. Since then, DD has filed an appeal in the District Court against that decision as well as against AN, although no decision had then been made in relation to the separate complaint against AN. [6] DD has no statutory right to file an appeal under s 102 of the Act. It i...