14002 items matching your search terms
[2015] NZSSAA 054 Reference No. SSA 138/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] The appellant appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive upheld by a Benefits Review Committee to suspend and t...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 176 ACR 297/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NIGEL RENTON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 28 September 2021 Heard at: Via AVL video link Appearances: Mr A Beck for the appellant Mr I Hunt for the respondent Judgment:...
...Authority considered an application for stay brought by AFFCO. The application was made on the basis that Mr Rossiter’s claim relied on two decisions of this Court, both of which were at the time subject to appellate consideration in the Court of Appeal. [7] The first appealed judgment was a decision of a full Court that Union members such as Mr Rossiter were employees of AFFCO during the off-season and, separately, that AFFCO had unlawfully locked out such employees. 2...
...as responsible trustees, along with the independent trustee, Mr Kusabs.3 1 Hunia v Skerrett-White – Kawerau A8D (2016) 146 Waiariki MB 281 (146 WAR 281) 2 Hunia v Skerrett-White – Kawerau A8D [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 50 (2017 APPEAL 50) 3 Māori Land Online <www.maorilandonline.govt.nz> 263 Waiariki MB 95 [4] Eventually, the file was returned to me. This is because the case managers have changed since the issue of the Appellate Court decision. Thi...
[2012] NZACA 03 ACA 11/05 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN NOEL BORST Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mike Dark for...
...Roberts submitted, s5(1) of the Interpretation Act 1999 requires the meaning of an enactment to be ascertained from its text and in the light of its purpose. He cited Agnew v Pardington [2006] 2 NZLR 520 at paragraph 32 where the Court of Appeal stated: … there is no doubt that the text of a provision must be interpreted having regard to the Act as a whole and the legal system generally. [15] Mr Robert’s submitted that speedy justice is the Authority’s statutory...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 146 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s325(2) of the Act AWAROA AERODROME LIMITED (ENV-2019-CHC-104) Appellant TASMAN DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 2 September 2019 Date of Issue: 2 September 2019 DECISION AS TO COSTS A: Un...
...counsel for plaintiff Tanya Kennedy and Paul McBride, counsel for defendant Judgment: 2 August 2012 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT NO 3 OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] Before the Court hears and decides the issues remitted to it by the Court of Appeal in its judgment of 21 November 2011, 1 it is necessary to resolve the parties’ dispute about what the Court of Appeal has remitted and how this is to be dealt with. [2] During the timetabled receipt of submissions from counsel for the...
...second application by New Zealand Post Ltd for a stay of this proceeding and to vacate the hearing scheduled to begin on 24 February 2025. [2] NZ Post’s first application was made when an application to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal in an unrelated judgment, Rasier Operations BV v E Tū Inc, was pending.1 [3] NZ Post’s second application was filed on 14 January 2025 and followed the Supreme Court granting leave to appeal in the Rasier case.2 The first app...
Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 148 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2022-AKL-000010) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Applicant / Section 274 p...