Search Results

Search results for appeal.

14004 items matching your search terms

  1. Graves v CAC 2003 & Langdon [2012] NZREADT 41 [pdf, 32 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision no: [2012] NZREADT 41 Reference no: READT 002/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN DAVID GRAVES Applicant/Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20003) First respondent AND NICHOLAS LANGDON Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms J Robson - Member Mr G Denley - Member HEARD ON THE P...

  2. READT annual report 2023 [pdf, 275 KB]

    ...30 June 2023. David Plunkett Chair Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal 2 OVERVIEW The Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal is a high performing tribunal producing quality decisions. There were no successful appeals to the High Court from our decisions this financial year. The Tribunal received 28 cases and disposed of 28 cases. The number of outstanding cases before the Tribunal at the end of the financial year remained the same at 27....

  3. Hawke v ACC [2013] NZACA 5 [pdf, 86 KB]

    BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY [2013] NZACA 5 ACA 7/12 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN DIANE HAWKE Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 February 2013 at Auckland Authority: Robyn Bedford Counsel: P Schmidt for appellant; CJ Hlavac for respondent Judgement: 15 April 201...

  4. SB v XQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 663 (3 September 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...infringement notice and fine by XQ Limited. XQ Limited alleged SB did not comply with parking terms and conditions at its [City] Central [supermarket] site. The breach notice and fine have since been waived by XQ Limited, however SB alleges XQ Limited’s appeal system is unsatisfactory and not fit for purpose. 2. SB says XQ Limited improperly levied the fine because his evidence shows he was legitimately parked. SB claims costs of up to $10,000.00 for the time and inconvenience of ha...

  5. OIA-119562.pdf [pdf, 2 MB]

    ...March 2025 Ref: OIA 119562 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request Thank you for your email of 15 February 2025 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding appeals and judicial reviews from the Family Court to the High Court. Specifically, you requested: ...Statistical data (number) for each year from 2014 to 2024, categorized under the following Acts: • Care of Children Act 2004 • Family...

  6. Singh v New Zealand Law Society [2017] NZLCDT 20 [pdf, 250 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZLCDT 20 LCDT 013/17 IN THE MATTER of an Appeal under s 42 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN ABHAY KUMAR SINGH Appellant AND THE NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Respondent CHAIR Judge BJ Kendall (retired) MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms C Rowe Mr T Simmonds Mr W Smith Mr I Williams HEARING at Auckland DATE 24 August 2017 DATE OF DECISION 4 September 2017 COUN...

  7. Establishment of Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal (2) [pdf, 402 KB]

    ...Cabinet paper therefore recommends authorising you to take any further detailed policy decisions that may arise during the drafting of the Tribunal Bill, in consultation with the Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration. Proposal: Limit first appeals by requiring leave from the High Court (see draft Cabinet paper paragraphs 39 to 42) 14. The 2017 Labour manifesto statement indicated that limited appeal rights from a Tribunal would be preserved. There are several factors to ba...

  8. [2023] NZEnvC 121 Cooper v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 240 KB]

    Cooper et ors v KDC Decision on Application to Stay IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 121 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN COOPER, CRAMOND, HARRIS, HODKINSON, LEE AND MCKINNEY (ENV-2022-AKL-142) Appellants AND KAIPARA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND VERMONT STREET PARTNERS LIMITED Applicant Court: Chief Environment Court...

  9. What happens next

    ...infringing. The maximum amount the tribunal can order the account holder to pay is $15,000. Decisions The tribunal will generally make its decision 'on the papers' based on the written information provided by the parties. All decisions are given in writing. Appeal the tribunal’s decision You can only appeal the tribunal’s decision if you believe it’s wrong in law. An appeal must be lodged with the High Court within 20 working days of you being told the tribunal’s decision. If you do ap...

  10. Defend a claim

    ...Privacy Act 2020 Statement of Reply – Privacy Act 2020 named as a defendant in an application for an access order under section 104 of the Privacy Act 2020 Enforcement of access direction - Reply – Privacy Act 2020 named as a respondent in an appeal against an access direction under section 105 of the Privacy Act 2020 Appeal against an access direction – Reply – Privacy Act 2020 named as a respondent in an appeal against a compliance notice or against the decision of the Privacy C...

    Located in: