[2011] NZEmpC 71 Gaut v BP Oil [pdf, 174 KB]
...Turner. All the witnesses appeared to be doing their best to accurately recall for the Court the relevant events which had, of course, occurred over two years previously. [33] Both parties accepted the legal principle as stated by the Court of Appeal in Waitemata District Health Board v Timu 2 that “obscene or abusive language” could be capable of being regarded as serious misconduct justifying dismissal. Responsibly, Mr Jackson did not try to dispute that if Mr Gaut had use...