[2024] NZEmpC 91 (Judgment (No 6) of Judge M S King 28 May 2024) [pdf, 323 KB]
...(b) whether there are assets to which the order can apply; and (c) whether there is a real risk that the respondents would dissipate or dispose of the assets, so as to render the respondent judgment proof. [18] In Shore v Narain, the Court of Appeal also emphasised the importance of the overall justice of the case, balancing the need to protect the applicant against prejudice or hardship caused to a respondent or third parties.4 Whether STU has a good arguable case [19] There is...