Search Results

1. Brightwell - Okauia B3B1 Block (2017) 135 Waikato Maniapoto MB121 (135 WMN 121) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...MB 130 [27] It is my view that the actions available to the Court now are to consider any review application that might be filed, or to cancel the occupation order pursuant to ss 330 and 330A. I understand that Evelyn Brightwell intends to appeal this decision. In the circumstances I will refrain from taking any further action in relation to the occupation order until the decision of the Māori Appellate Court is to hand. Pronounced in open Court at 11.45am in Hamilton on...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 38 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...hearings are open to the public and can be freely reported. Documents produced in court are available for inspection. However, the High Court Rules recognise that outside of that hearing process (and a brief window of opportunity relating to the appeal period), persons other than the parties need permission to inspect documents held on the court file. The reason for this distinction was described by Toogood J in X v Standards Committee (No 1) of the New Zealand Law Society in the...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 47 Singh v Trustees of the Wellington Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten Trust [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...the mediator signs the agreed terms of settlement: 1 The settlement is final and binding and enforceable by us; 2 Except for enforcement purposes, neither of us may seek to bring those terms before the Authority or Court whether by action, appeal and application for review or otherwise; 3 The terms of the settlement cannot be cancelled under s 7 of the Contractual Remedies Act 1979; 4 That s 149(4) provides that a person who breaches an agreed term of settlement to which (...

4. Kidwell v Karaitiana - Waipuka 3A3A(2019)78 Tākitimu MB 7 (78 TKT 7) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...or agent, of rent, purchase money, royalties, or other proceeds of the alienation of land, or of any compensation payable in respect of other revenue derived from the land, affected by any order to which an application under section 45 or an appeal under Part 2 relates. (2) Notwithstanding anything in the Crown Proceedings Act 1950, any injunction made by the court under this section may be expressed to be binding on the Māori Trustee. (3) Any injunction made by the court und...

5. INZ (Calder) v Horan [2019] NZIACDT 23 (23 April 2019) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...Mr Horan rejects the Tribunal’s previous decision. He repeats his explanation and justification for his conduct given earlier to the Tribunal. He states that he will continue to stand by his actions which, if necessary, will be vindicated on appeal. Mr Horan describes the Code as a ridiculous “Code of Entrapment”. He denies that “we” (immigration advisers) are “the slaves of Africa”. According to him, the Authority and the Tribunal amount to a counterproductive co...

6. Nikora v Trustees of Te Uru Taumatua and Te Komiti o Runga (2019) 221 Waiariki MB 200 (221 WAR 200) [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...or agent, of rent, purchase money, royalties, or other proceeds of the alienation of land, or of any compensation payable in respect of other revenue derived from the land, affected by any order to which an application under section 45 or an appeal under Part 2 relates. (2) Notwithstanding anything in the Crown Proceedings Act 1950, any injunction made by the court under this section may be expressed to be binding on the Māori Trustee. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public...

7. [2020] NZEnvC 112 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...year to run). On the other hand if the consents are to commence on 2 October 2021 - which may be realistic since the Joint ORC/LCG submissions dated 17 February 2020 [13] [Environment Court document 85]. 5 (First) Interim Decision has been appealed to the High Court- then only Cluden Station's consent 2003.251.V1 and Kotiti's consent 2001.546 will need to be surrendered. (11) If the consents are to commence soon then there is one other point not directly referred to by...

8. [2020] NZREADT 08 - Bond (25 February 2020) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...to pay a fine of $750. Payment is to be made to the Authority within 20 working days of the date of this decision. [33] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperson ________________ Ms C Sandelin Member ___________...

9. 15 May 2020 Summary of Justice Budget Initiatives for Stakeholders [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...injustices, following fair and transparent processes. This investment will fund the operation of the newly established Criminal Cases Review Commission from 1 July 2020, as required by the CCRC Act 2019. The CCRC can refer cases back to the Court of Appeal, but it does not determine guilt or innocence. This additional check and balance will help build public confidence in the justice system. 8 Honouring our responsibilities to Māori (Vote: Treaty) Implementat...

10. Rabson v Solicitor-General (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 312 KB]

    ...105 of the Human Rights Act. Section 105 requires the Tribunal "to act according to the substantial merits of the case, without regard to technicalities". That section applies, with necessary modifications, to decisions of this Court on appeal against a decision of the Tribunal: s123(5). [46] The Tribunal has an express power to dismiss proceedings, if satisfied that they are frivolous, vexatious or not brought in good faith: s115. As Mr Laurenson points out, the Tribunal delib...