Search Results

1. Moke - Succession to Te Poroa Joseph Malcolm (2025) 339 Waiariki MB 182 (339 WAR 182) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...under s 244, the Court cannot exercise its powers unless satisfied that there is a sufficient degree of support for the variation amongst beneficiaries. 2 Larkins v Kataia – Waihou Hutoia D2A Block [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 159 (2013 APPEAL 159) at [19] – [28]. 339 Waiariki MB 187 [17] Taking into account both the level of support, and the difficulty in taking into account the views of beneficiaries when only Kāwai can vote, I will not accept a term where only...

2. PSPLA-individual-licence-annual-return-smart-form-July-2025.pdf [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...section 65 of the Land Transport Act 1998, or an earlier equivalent provision?  Yes  No Have you ever been ordered by a New Zealand court to be imprisoned following conviction for an offence and that conviction or order has not been quashed on appeal?  Yes  No In the last 7 years, have you ever been convicted by a New Zealand court of an offence under the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 or Private Investigators and Security Guards Act 1974 for...

3. Practice directions, legislation & rules

   ...Extend Time to File Documents; 8: Search and Freezing Orders; 11: Amended Challenges Incorporating Costs Determinations; 14: Prosecutions for Offences Under Employment Relations Act 2000; and 15: Sealed Judgments and Certificates of Judgment for Appeals and Other Purposes.

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court

4. [2025] NZREADT 31 – Green v REAA (30 July 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...Applicant’s application for review of the Registrar’s decision is dismissed and the Registrar’s decision is confirmed. [36] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of Act, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules 2016. ___________________ C Sandelin Deputy Chairperson ___________________ G Denley Member __________________...

5. Measuring reoffending with court data: proposed tier 1 specification [pdf, 750 KB]

   ...relatively complex to describe for users of Tier 1 statistics and to maintain as an ongoing system for producing statistics. Nevertheless such methods are used (eg probably in Scotland, The Scottish Government, 2013). The second option is more appealing conceptually and consistent with some current Corrections measures (eg re- imprisonment rate of released prisoners). However, for Tier 1 purposes we recommend against such complications. First, this complicates the calculation and ex...

6. [2012] NZEmpC 110 de Bruin v Canterbury DH [pdf, 199 KB]

   DE BRUIN V CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD NZEmpC CHCH [2012] NZEmpC 110 [11 July 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2012] NZEmpC 110 CRC 4/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN KEES DE BRUIN Plaintiff AND CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: 5-7 June 2012 (Heard at Christchurch) Counsel: Andrew McKenzie, counsel for the plaintiff Penny Shaw, counsel fo

7. Evesham v Auckland Standards Committee LCRO 136 / 2009 (5 November 2009) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...legislation or rules that the practitioner may have breached. In this regard the reliance on Kollar v Civil Aviation Authority (14 May 1997, High Court, Christchurch, John Hansen J, AP76/97) was misplaced. That in that case the defendant successfully appealed a summary conviction for breaching the Civil Aviation Regulations. The charges flowed from a ballooning accident in which three people died. That kind of proceeding has little in common with a professional disciplinary process. I...

8. Mok v Boyd [2010] NZWHT Auckland 29 [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...uncertainty and have been required to move out of their home while the repairs had been carried out. Page | 15 [39] The decision of the High Court in Findlay Family Trust4 confirms that, in accordance with the decision of the Court of Appeal in Byron Avenue the usual award per unit for occupiers is $25,000. I am not satisfied that there is any justification for reducing what has been awarded by the Courts as the maximum bench mark for an award of general damages to c...

9. Due North Trust v Gardner [2011] NZWHT Auckland 64 [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...correct that construction problems with the jamb flashings and other details might have been avoided had appropriate construction details been included either on the plans themselves or in documents attached to the plans. However, the Court of Appeal in Sunset Terraces1 held that Councils did not need to ensure manufacturer’s specifications were attached to consent 1 North Shore City Council v Body Corporate 188529 [201...

10. Abraham v Auckland City Council [pdf, 111 KB]

    ...subsequent owners, in particular regarding the issue of building consents, the carrying out of inspections (if the Council has done the inspections), and the issue of a Code Compliance Certificate. This principle was established by the Court of Appeal in Invercargill City Council v Hamlin [1994] 3 NZLR 513, and confirmed most recently in Dicks v Hobson Swan Construction Ltd & Ors, High Court Auckland, CIV 2004-404-1065, 22 December 2006 (Baragwanath J). [45] Here counsel for...