14252 items matching your search terms
...justified pursuant to s 91(1)(a). 6 Transcript, 18 December 2012 at page 18. 7 Body Corporate 170989 v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 35. 8 This decision is under appeal. Page | 9 Did the claimants incur unnecessary costs as a result of the Council’s actions? [25] The Council contends that it was always necessary for the claimants to instruct either Mr Flay or someone else with similar ex...
...法律援助仲裁庭（Legal Aid Tribunal） – 毛利土地法庭（Māori Land Court） 10 – 难民身份处（Refugee Status Branch） – 移民与保护仲裁庭（Immigration and Protection Tribunal） – 社会保障上诉局（Social Security Appeal Authority） – 税务复核仲裁庭（Taxation Review Tribunal） – 租赁事务仲裁庭（Tenancy Tribunal）。 为了避免上法庭而进行的调解案也可能获得法律援助。 以下情况不提供民...
...meeting to discuss the lease proposal. As I now understand it the injunction is sought for the provision of further information to the applicant with the view that the injunction will remain in place pending the outcome of the Environment Court appeal proceedings. [7] Counsel for the applicant submits that regard should be had to the fact that there is currently a review of trust application before the Court which may result in a change of trustees and as such an order is required...
...which records that he was born on 13 June 1954. His mother is recorded as Tehohipera Teakau Tiopira and his father is recorded as Naki Tiopira. 1 [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167) 2 [2009] Chief Judge’s MB 209-225 (2009 CJ 209) 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 103 [9] Having considered the Report and the evidence provided in support I am satisfied that an error has been made in the presenta...
...of rent, purchase money, royalties, or other proceeds of the alienation of land, or of any compensation payable in respect of other revenue derived from the land, affected by any order to which an application under section 45 of this Act or an appeal under Part 2 of this Act relates. 9 Application A20150001847. 99 Taitokerau MB 102 (2) Notwithstanding anything in the Crown Proceedings Act 1950, any injunction made by t...
...the Court of her ineligibility to succeed to the deceased’s Māori land interests at the time an application was made for succession. This 1 [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167) 2 [2009] Chief Judge’s MB 209-225 (2009 CJ 209) 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 94 correspondence confirms that Emily Pace separated in 1983 from Philip Pace and that her marriage was dissolved in 1991. [13] Emily has also...
...subclause 12(3): (a) The flagrancy of the infringement; [28] The Tribunal does not consider the infringements that are the subject of this application to be “flagrant.” The Tribunal takes account of the applicant’s references to the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Skids Programme Management Limited v McNeill [2013] 1 NZLR 1 and the analysis of “flagrancy” that case sets forth. In the present application, however, only the minimum conditions for an application unde...
...that he is, “seriously considering resigning”. He stated: 22. I found myself looking at properties in the country the other day. I realised that I was looking for a hideaway because the prospect of staying where I am is currently so unappealing. In reference to Mr Ross, Mr Chote deposed: 19. The problem is that with Dominic‟s re-instatement Josh has handed in his resignation. If Dominic returns, Josh will leave. Josh is absolutely clear on this. If Josh leaves, he...
...this Court does not have jurisdiction to award costs to lay persons for costs incurred by themselves in relation to this proceeding. [12] In Hapeta - Whakapoungakau 3B1B Trust 3 the Maori Appellate Court referred to a decision of the Court of Appeal in Official Assignee v Registrar of the High Court at Christchurch 4 which reaffirmed the general rule of practice that a lay litigant should not be paid for their time and trouble unless there were exceptional circumstances that jus...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000112 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 47 BETWEEN ROGER JERZY AND SAMANTHA KAY ZAGORSKI Claimants AND WILKINSON BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent AND ALLIED HOUSE INSPECTIONS LIMITED Second Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Third Respondent AND RICHARD ANDREW JOHN WILKINSON Fourth Respondent AND CATHERINE WILKINSON Fifth Respondent AND TIMOTHY JOHN BURCHER Sixth Respondent AND