Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 77 Courage v Attorney-General [pdf, 422 KB]

   ...which made it clear that the Employment Relations Act was designed to provide a better framework for employment relations, and to recognise that employment relationships were not simply contractual, economic exchanges.33 [139] In declining leave to appeal against the full Court’s decision in Prasad, the Court of Appeal described the approach as “entirely orthodox” and not laying down any far-reaching new principles.34 The Court of Appeal pointed out that, in any case,...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 089 Shundi Queenstown Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 14 MB]

   SHUNDI v QLDC – FINAL DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 89 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN SHUNDI QUEENSTOWN LIMITED (ENV-2020-CHC-85) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: In Chambers on the papers Last case eve...

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000186 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.6 MB]

   Notice of appeal to Environment Court against decision on proposed Auckland combined plan Dated: 16 September 2016 Before the Environment Court In the matter of: Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) - Appeal against decision on proposed Auckland combined plan – s 156(1) of the LGATPA – Topics 043 & 044 Transport - parking ratio for all activities in Viaduct Harbour Precin...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 075 Otago Regional Council v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 27 MB]

   ...REGIONAL COUNCIL V QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 75 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2021-CHC-070) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christ...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 65 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...establish his business, and that there was no evidence that he fraudulently undermined or disclosed confidential information of Caffe Coffee, relying on the dicta of Walker v Aiken 3 and Schilling v Kidd Garrett Ltd. 4 [35] But as the Court of Appeal made clear in Big Save Furniture v Bridge, a duty of fidelity is not breached only when an employee acts fraudulently or dishonestly. 5 The Court confirmed that the duty of fidelity and loyalty which an employee owes to an employe...

6. Ngati Porou Deed to Amend the Deed of Agreement 9 Aug 2017 [pdf, 8.8 MB]

   ...their rohe (territory) that are contiguous to the foreshore and seabedmarine and coastal area. B. Since 1840, nga hapu o Ngati Porou have retained ownership of a significant proportion of those coastal lands. C. Following the decision of the Court of Appeal in Ngati Apa & Ors v A ttorney- General, Te Runanga o Ngati Porou, as well as particular whanau and hapu of Ngati Porou, made applications to the Maori Land Court for orders declaring the foreshore and seabed in the Ngati Porou ro...

7. Takimoana - Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Ahu Whenua Trust (2014) 90 Taitokerau MB 67 (90 TTK 67) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...of promoting retention and utilisation of the land by the owners. 8 Rameka v Hall [2013] NZAR 1208 (CA). 9 Larkins v Kaitaia – Waihou Hutoia D2A Block [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 159 (2013 APPEAL 159). 10 Re Schroder’s Wills Trusts [2004] 1 NZLR 695. 90 Taitokerau MB 76 [34] In support of this argument Mr Peters produced a commentary in the form of a summary chart from the Westlaw NZ Electronic Library 11 Mr Pete...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 066 Hamilton City Council [pdf, 20 MB]

   ...enable a range of urban activities occurring on the TGH and CPL land which were still prohibited by the UEPA Overlay by virtue of the rural zoning of the land. [23] The Council decided to reject the private plan change request. [24] TGH and CPL appealed this decision to the Environment Court. The appeal was later withdrawn, because TGH and CPL decided to ask the Minister for the Environment to determine that their project was a proposal of national significance. The Board of Inqui...

9. OIA-113021.pdf [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...tribunals Regulation Jurisdiction/administering agency If not Mlnlstrv of Justice 1. Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Regulations Copyright Tribunal (legislation administered by 2011 Ministry of Business. Innovation and Emoloyment) 2. Court of Appeal Fees Regulations 2001 3. Customs and Excise Regulations 1996 Customs Appeal Authority (legislation administered by New Zealand Customs Service) 4. Disoutes Tribunal Rules 1989 5. District Court Fees Reaulations 2009 6. District Co...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 248 Federated Farmers of New Zealand v Waikato District Council [pdf, 6.9 MB]

    Federated Farmers of New Zealand v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 248 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2022-AKL-051) TRANSPOWER NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-074) Appellants AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Enviro...