14992 items matching your search terms
...“[a] profession’s most valuable asset is its collective reputation and the confidence which that inspires”.22 [25] It is these principles to which I direct the penalties imposed in this decision. Censure/reprimand [26] The Court of Appeal in New Zealand Law Society v B23 21 Bolton v Law Society [1994] 2 All ER 486. saw little difference between a censure and a reprimand. At [39] the Court stated: 22 At 492. 23 Ne...
...rehearing has been granled, Ihe period allowedfor an appeal to the Maori Appel/ale COUl'l shall not commence 10 nm until the rehearing has been disposed of by afinal order of the Courl. (7) Subsection (6) applies, wilh Ihe necessmy modifications, to appeals to Ihe High Courlllnder seclion 63(2) of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. [26] As I have said earlier, much of the material put before the Court by Mrs Crosby and others is irrelevant. [27] There are however some matters wh...
...fight broke out, on another only four shareholders tumed up, and on another her legal advisor was accused of being a thief and a crook. She also cites a decision of the Court to set aside trus land as a reserve, which decision was successfblly appealed. She blames the Maori Trustee for not having completed "the job", which I take to be a suggestion that the Maori Tl1Istee was meant to paltition and allocate more of the land. She refers to the land being abused and building...
...review of the Registrar’s decision to decline her application for renewal of her licence is granted. Her licence is to be renewed. [44] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. _____...
...parties or submitters to join the proceedings. 19. In my submission successors to any 274 parties would automatically be able to continue their involvement in the direct referral process4 and any successors to a submission could seek to join the appeal as a section 274 party using the waiver process described above. 1 Section 274(1)(d) of the RMA 2 Section 274(1)(e) of the RMA 3 Te Mauri o Te Wai Inc v Northland Regional Coun...
...rehearing, the Court may affirm its former determination, or may vary or annul that determination, and may exercise any jurisdiction that it could have exercised on the original hearing. (6) When a rehearing has been granted, the period allowed for an appeal to the Maori Appellate Court shall not commence to run until the rehearing has been disposed of by a final order of the Court. [15] Rule 8.1 of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 (“the 2011 Rules”) also governs rehearing app...
...established to require that HNZ exercises its powers to require information in a way that protects individual privacy. For example, there is a requirement to consult with the Privacy Commissioner about the content of the code of conduct. 35. The Court of Appeal has said that the main aim of s 21 is to protect privacy interests: “It is only where a person’s reasonable expectations of privacy have been breached that a personal remedy under the Bill of Rights... is available. The reas...
...s 45 applications must be accompanied by proof of the flaw or error identified, either through the production of evidence not available or not known of at the time the order was made or through submissions on the law. [9] Finally, the Court of Appeal has recently confirmed, the power under s 44(1) falls into two parts:5 The first is the evaluative decision as to whether the order made was erroneous in fact and law because of any mistake or omission on the part of the Court or t...
...prohibit the distribution of money collected for rent, purchase, royalties, etc. of the alienation of land, or of compensation payable in respect of other revenue derived from the land, affected by any order to which an application under s 45 or an appeal under Part 2 relates. [30] The established principles for granting a permanent injunction have been addressed by the Māori Appellate Court in Taueki v Horowhenua Sailing Club - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block as follows:6 [15] In...
...freezing order could be made, the Court had to be satisfied that the applicant had a “good arguable case on an accrued or prospective cause of action” against the respondent.4 The Court was satisfied to the necessary standard. [24] The Court of Appeal has confirmed that a good arguable case is established if the allegations in the proposed claim are capable of tenable argument and are supported by sufficient evidence, bearing in mind the early stage at which the application is...