Search Results

1. LCRO 158/2018 YCH v TSR (30 September 2020) [pdf, 396 KB]

   ...three surviving children were herself, Mr QSR, and Ms BSR. ISR died in 1967. 11 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]–[41]. 10 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for...

2. Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 564 KB]

   ...Zealand • two persons, being officers of the Ministry of Health, one of whom shall be appointment as chairman. Records The documents held are minutes of meetings, a file of correspondence and administrative matters, and files concerning the appeals and objections heard by the Committee. Documents relating to decision-making processes The Medicines Classification Committee uses the Members’ Handbook manuals for administrative purposes. 20 Contact The Secretary...

3. Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 564 KB]

   ...Zealand • two persons, being officers of the Ministry of Health, one of whom shall be appointment as chairman. Records The documents held are minutes of meetings, a file of correspondence and administrative matters, and files concerning the appeals and objections heard by the Committee. Documents relating to decision-making processes The Medicines Classification Committee uses the Members’ Handbook manuals for administrative purposes. 20 Contact The Secretary...

4. [2024] NZLVT 062 - Edwards v Minister for Land Information (29 November 2024) [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...for the Respondent, at [79]. 24 Synopsis of Submissions for the Respondent, at [80]. 25 Synopsis of Submissions for the Respondent, at [81]. 26 Green & McCahill Holdings Ltd v Auckland Council [2013] NZHC 507, at [55]. The decision was appealed to the Court of Appeal. In relation to general principles however, there was not a significant disagreement by the Court of Appeal with the decision of the High Court. 27 Russell v Minister of Lands (1898) 17 NZLR 241 (SC), at 253; and...

5. [2023] NZEnvC 277 Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua v Auckland Council [pdf, 9.2 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 277 IN THE MATTER of appeals under sections 120 and 121 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA/the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an application by Waste Management NZ Ltd for resource consents to construct and operate a new landfill at 1232 State Highway 1, Wayby Valley, Wellsford BETWEEN TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI WHĀTUA (ENV-2021-AKL-076) ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTEC...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 025 Shundi Queenstown Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...the purposes of a further and final decision effecting grant of consent to the Modified Proposal. C. There will be no order as to costs, these are to lie where they fall. REASONS Introduction [1] Shundi Queenstown Limited ('Shundi')1 appealed against a decision of the Queenstown Lakes District Council ('QLDC') to decline land use consent for a hotel proposal at 53-65 Frankton Road, Queenstown ('Site').2 A number of submitters to the first instance heari...

7. Ward v Maccol Developments Ltd [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...Accordingly, the insuperable problem the Owners face is that unless a “reasonable discoverability test” could be held to apply to the accrual date, the Owners’ claim in contract is statute barred. [64] Mr Rooney submits that there is Court of Appeal authority to the effect that where the contractual duty is not to cause damage by negligence, which he further submitted was the case here, the cause of action accrues at the date of the damage (Day v Mead [1987] 2NZLR 443 at...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 101 GF v Comptroller of Customs [pdf, 513 KB]

   ...Governments have signed future Governments up to a range of new exemplary conduct) but the point does not need to be decided in the context of this case. 23 Armstrong v Attorney-General [1995] 1 ERNZ 43 (EmpC). The decision was overturned on appeal but not on this point: Attorney-General v Armstrong [1996] 1 ERNZ 344 (CA). See too NZ Educational Institute v Board of Trustees of Auckland Normal Intermediate School [1992] 3 ERNZ 243 (EmpC) at 269. 24 Employment Relations Act 20...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 41 ABC Developmental Learning Centres v Plasmeyer [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...circumstances”. [10] The defendant submits that her proceedings were conducted responsibly and relatively efficiently. The hearing took less than a day. She emphasises the strict application of s 40(2) as illustrated by the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Laverty v Para Franchising Ltd. 2 The defendant says that her circumstances are not “quite out of the ordinary” following Awa v Independent News Auckland Ltd (No 2). 3 [11] Although I am prepared to, and do, make an...

10. [2010] NZEmpC 127 Brownie v Fuster [pdf, 17 KB]

    ...ordered Mr Brownie to pay Mr Fuster more than $9,000 in arrears of wages, interest and expenses. That determination was issued on 3 August 2010. [3] On 2 September 2010, the registrar received a letter from Mr Brownie saying that he wished to “appeal” the Authority’s determination. The letter did not meet the minimum requirements for a statement of claim and was not accompanied by the required filing fee. In any event, it was received by the Court outside the 28 day perio...