14004 items matching your search terms
...and Tribunals Centre Level 2, 41 Federal Street Auckland 1010 PO Box 7174, Wellesley St., Auckland 1141 1. I, K Vernon, wish to be a party to the following proceedings: Auckland Council, Proposed combined Auckland (Unitary) Plan, Appeal ENV – 2016 – AKL - 214 Todd Property Group Ltd 2. I am a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has because the outcome may affect my property interests....
...Tribunals Centre Level 2, 41 Federal Street Auckland 1010 PO Box 7174, Wellesley St., Auckland 1141 1. I, Keith Vernon, wish to be a party to the following proceedings: Auckland Council, Proposed combined Auckland (Unitary) Plan, Appeal ENV – 2016 – AKL - 190 ENV – 2016 – AKL - 191 National Trading Company of NZ 2. I am a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has because the ou...
...and Tribunals Centre Level 2, 41 Federal Street Auckland 1010 PO Box 7174, Wellesley St., Auckland 1141 1. I, K Vernon, wish to be a party to the following proceedings: Auckland Council, Proposed combined Auckland (Unitary) Plan, Appeal ENV – 2016 – AKL – 225, 233, 222, and 217 ACI Operations NZ Ltd, NZ Steel Ltd, NZ Starch Ltd, and Waste Management Ltd 2. I am a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the...
1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT / I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA AT AUCKLAND UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act BETWEEN BALANCE AGRI-NUTRIENTS LIMITED (ENV – 2020 – AKL – 000093) Appellant WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF WAIRAKEI PASTORAL LIMITED’S WISH TO BE PARTY TO APPEAL 29 SEPTEMBER 2020...
...While some hearings need to be “face to face”, the Authority will generally consider using an audio visual link over a computer for the hearing. In most cases it will be the preferred approach. That is to ensure that the Authority can progress appeals with as little disruption as possible regardless of alert levels. The Authority will give you notice of the steps, and you will have the opportunity say how you want the appeal to proceed. The Authority is very flexible in the way it proc...
1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT / I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA AT AUCKLAND UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act BETWEEN WAIKATO RIVER AUTHORITY (ENV – 2020 – AKL – 000090) Appellant WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF WAIRAKEI PASTORAL LIMITED’S WISH TO BE PARTY TO APPEAL 29 SEPTEMBER 2020 C...
...and Tribunals Centre Level 2, 41 Federal Street Auckland 1010 PO Box 7174, Wellesley St., Auckland 1141 1. I, K Vernon, wish to be a party to the following proceedings: Auckland Council, Proposed combined Auckland (Unitary) Plan, Appeal ENV – 2016 – AKL – 192 ENV – 2016 – AKL – 193 Kiwi Property Group 2. I am a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has because the outcome may af...
...and Tribunals Centre Level 2, 41 Federal Street Auckland 1010 PO Box 7174, Wellesley St., Auckland 1141 1. I, K Vernon, wish to be a party to the following proceedings: Auckland Council, Proposed combined Auckland (Unitary) Plan, Appeal ENV – 2016 – AKL - 206 Cato Bolam Consultants Ltd 2. I am a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has because the outcome may affect my property interests....
[2015] NZSSAA 011 Reference No. SSA 094/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS [1] The appellant lodged an appeal with the Authority on 14 July 2014 in relation to a decision of the Chief Executive upheld by a Benefits...
...of this Court dated 4 September 2013, 1 the defendant was granted a stay of execution of earlier judgments of this Court dated 13 May 2013, 2 and 4 June 2013. 3 The stay was granted on the basis that the defendant had applied to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal the decisions of the Court. Such leave was subsequently granted. The appeal has now been heard by the Court of Appeal and the appeal was dismissed. [2] In addition to an order staying execution of the judgments o...