Search Results

1. Welsh v Welsh - Taiharuru 4C3D [2024] Chief Judge's MB 1 (2024 CJ 1) [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...that standard’s inherent flexibility that takes into account the nature and gravity of the matter at issue.2 This means that the applicant must establish on the balance of probabilities that there was a mistake or omission. [16] The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the power under s 44(1) falls into two parts:3 2 Tau v Nga Whanau O Morven & Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section IX Block [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167). 3 Inia v Julian [2020] NZ...

2. MOJ0342.2-Homicide-factsheet-FEB22-PRINT.pdf [pdf, 689 KB]

   ...your victim impact statement in court at the sentencing hearing. Ask your court victim advisor or police victim liaison officer to ask the judge for you. The judge is required to consider your victim impact statement when sentencing the offender. APPEALS Both the prosecutor and the offender have the right to appeal the verdict and the sentence. This means a higher court will look at the case again. If this happens, the prosecutor will let you know about the process. After court Once...

3. MOJ0344.2-factsheet-Affected-by-crime-Nov21-PRINT.pdf [pdf, 654 KB]

   ...your victim impact statement in court at the sentencing hearing. Ask your court victim advisor or police victim liaison officer to ask the judge for you. The judge is required to consider your victim impact statement when sentencing the offender. APPEALS Both the prosecutor and the offender have the right to appeal the verdict and the sentence. This means a higher court will look at the case again. If this happens, the prosecutor will let you know about the process. After court Once...

4. Devon v Devon - Succession to Hone Ihaka Devon [2024] Chief Judge's MB 201 (2024 CJ 201) [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...that standard’s inherent flexibility that takes into account the nature and gravity of the matter at issue.2 This means that the applicant must establish on the balance of probabilities that there was a mistake or omission. [19] The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the power under s 44(1) falls into two parts:3 The first is an evaluative decision as to whether the order made was “erroneous in fact and law because of any mistake or omission on the part of the court or the R...

5. 2024 NZPSPLA 005 pdf [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...September 2021 during the Auckland Covid-19 level 4 lockdown Mr Simi was stopped by police driving a vehicle. He refused to say who he was, provide his licence or his travel /exemption worker documentation. He was issued an infringement notice which he appealed and lost. [3] Mr Simi denies he failed to cooperate with police on 2 May 2023 and 8 September 2021. He also denies he breached the PSPPI Act by refusing to provide his COA and refusing to advise the name of the security comp...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 199 Breen v Prime Resources Company Ltd [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...makes plain, there was no suggestion at the time that Mr Chung was deliberately being disingenuous. [16] The distinction between personal grievances and disputes, and the remedial routes available in respect of each, was dealt with by the Court of Appeal in Auckland College of Education v Hagg. While the Court was concerned with s 27(1)(b) of the Employment Contracts Act 1991, that provision was in materially the same terms as s 103(3) in the current Act.7 The Court made the foll...

7. P and R v EQC and MIS [2024] CEIT-2023-0014 [pdf, 331 KB]

   ...after 1 January 2011. 10) The parties’ submissions pointed out that the Tribunal’s decisions do not create precedent in a stare decisis sense. For such precedent to be created from a decision of this Tribunal, that decision would need to be appealed and the treatment of the law affirmed on appeal, an uncertain and drawn-out process. It was the view of the parties that the referral process under s53 would provide a swifter means to resolve the issue. The issues and questions...

8. [2024] NZIACDT 26 – QN v Nandan (12 November 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...and her husband. Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) declined residence on 19 November 2018 on the ground that the complainant had provided false evidence. The complainant and Ms Nandan blamed each other for the false document. [7] An appeal to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal was dismissed on 5 June 2019. [8] A complaint against Ms Nandan was made by the complainant to the Authority on 23 October 2019. 1 QN v Nandan [2024] NZIACDT 22. 3 Decision of the...

9. OIA-123110-data.xlsx [xlsx, 143 KB]

   ...Supervised 77 33 26 9 5 3 1 9 11 17 6 6 15 83 0 Employment Only 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Family 248 99 150 12 41 47 6 34 43 52 18 28 108 119 3 Family Supervised 111 34 59 5 11 18 1 11 12 18 9 17 31 70 1 Family Legal Advice 157 72 102 11 36 33 3 23 28 35 13 19 84 87 2 Court of Appeal / Supreme Court 147 27 42 4 8 13 3 5 13 13 8 6 18 58 1 Mental Health 49 26 30 4 4 8 0 5 15 16 6 5 15 22 3 Mental Health Supervised 7 3 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 15 0 Refugee Immigration 24 1 3 0 0 0...

10. [2025] NZREADT 17- IL v Irvine (29 May 2025) [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...commencement date of the lease. [7] On 12 November 2020 (at 11.00 am), the complainant sent the lease back to the licensee, signed by her. The licensee then added the words, “this will be no later than 1 [Footnote redacted]. We are informed an appeal has been filed in the High Court, but are not aware of its status. 3 1st January 2021”, at the end of cl 10.2. He signed the revised lease and returned it to the complainant that day (at 12.08 pm). She in turn sent it...