Search Results

1. AM v ZM LCRO 48 / 2010 (25 February 2011) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...Kyle v Legal Practitioners’ Complaints Committee (1999) 21 WAR 56 involved disciplinary proceedings against an Australian practitioner charged with attempting to mislead the court. The adverse finding against the Practitioner was unsuccessfully appealed. The appellant sought to argue that the case against him was flawed in that the Complaints Committee (and the Tribunal) found that there was an attempt to deliberately mislead the Court, but had at the same time accepted that there...

2. KY v DZ LCRO 174/2015 (25 October 2016) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...the LCRO on review [41] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:4 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for t...

3. [2018] NZEmpC 100 Elisara v Allianz NZ Ltd [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...assumed to relate to a matter at issue. Such fishing becomes impermissible where what is sought is not relevant to any pleaded cause of action, but might reveal material that could be the basis of a new head of claim. ... [19] And, as the Court of Appeal has recently observed in the employment context:8 [17] The test for disclosure under reg 38 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000 is broad and based on the Peruvian Guano test. We do not discern any error in Judge Corkill’s a...

4. JR v ST LCRO 57/2015 (2 December 2016) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...LCRO on review [27] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:8 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

5. Ratima v Smith - Te Haroto 2B2B (2018) 70 Takitimu MB 88 (70 TKT 88) [pdf, 500 KB]

   ...duties as a trustee. (2) The court may at any time, in respect of any trustee of a trust to which this section applies, enforce the obligations of his or her trust (whether by way of injunction or otherwise). [29] In Naera v Fenwick the Court of Appeal stated:13 [85] When considering a claim relating to breach of trust, the starting position is that trustees of Māori land are under the same obligations as other trustees. Equitable principles such as the duty of loyalty and good...

6. LCRO 054/2017 VM v CR (31 July 2017) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...scope of review [21] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:4 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

7. LCRO 099/2016 IJ v KL (28 July 2017) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...10 Letter KL to LCRO (17 June 2016). 11 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]-[41]. 6 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that

8. OP v UV LCRO 160/2015 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...of Review [60] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:10 [39] … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. [40] The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for...

9. LCRO 130/2016 RB v ZB (28 June 2017) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...scope of review [25] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:10 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for th...

10. LCRO 238/2017 VQ v CAR LIMITED (28 March 2019) [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...scope of review [36] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:2 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...