LCRO 369/2013 WS v AD (29 August 2017) [pdf, 334 KB]
...had produced that lease at the Tribunal hearing as part of the defence to NDT’s claim. [43] In considering NDT’s application for a rehearing, the Tribunal Referee rejected the argument that Mr AD had fabricated the lease document. [44] NDT appealed the Tribunal’s original decision dismissing its claim, and the District Court ordered the Tribunal to rehear the claim. This was on the basis that Mr WS had not been given sufficient time to consider documents that had been prov...