Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 215 Awatarariki Residents Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC ?- 15 Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND of an appeal under Schedule 1 to the Resource Management Act 1991 AWATARARIKI RESIDENTS INCORPORATED (ENV-2020-AKL-000064) Appellant BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL First Respondent WHAKATANE DISTRICT COUNCIL Second Respondent Chief Judge D A Kirkpatrick Commissioner A C E Leijne...

2. BORA Employment Relations Amendment Bill [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...Orr Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel 5 See the White Paper, A Bill of Rights for New Zealand (1985) AJHR A6 at [10.168] – [10.171]; Rishworth et al, The New Zealand Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press: Auckland, 2003) at 755. 6 New Health New Zealand Inc v Attorney-General [2015] NZHC 2138 at [62].

3. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v CAL2013-E000614 [2013] NZCOP 3 [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...found to have down/uploaded copyright works from the Internet without permission. [2] The applicant here is the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (RIANZ) which filed the application to the Tribunal as agent for the copyright owners Universal Music Group, Inc, Societe D’Invertissements et de Gestion and EMI Records Limited. The respondent is an individual internet account holder. [3] The case concerns the uploading of sound recorded songs by means of the BitTorrent Prot...

4. [2018] NZSSAA 49 (4 October 2018) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2012] NZAR 280. 2 Hogan v Chief Executive of the Department of Work and Income New Zealand HC Wellington AP 49/02, 26 August 2002. 3 Dunn v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development HC Auckland CIV-2006-485-2588, 29 November 2007; aff’d [2008] NZCA 436, [2009] NZAR 94. 4 T v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2017] NZHC 711. 5 held by the Government for defined purposes and disbursed incre...

5. Judge v Care Park New Zealand Ltd (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 14 [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...[2018] NZHRRT 14 Reference No. HRRT 052/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN PAUL CRAWFORD JUDGE PLAINTIFF AND CARE PARK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED FIRST DEFENDANT AND WAIKATO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SECOND DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms MA Roche, Co-Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr P Judge in person Mr J Horner for first defendant Mr S Hood for second defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the...

6. Khan v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 29 (17 March 2014) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...Arafat Khan Complainant AND Artika Archina Devi Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person. Complainant: In person. Adviser: S Singh, Singhs Barristers & Solicitors, Auckland. Date Issued: 17 March 2014 2 DECISION Preliminary [1] The essence of the complaint was that the adviser did not deal with the complainant; rather, unlicensed staff performed the professional duties and...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 31 Zara's Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...employment agreement. There is a dispute between Mr Kocatürk and Zara’s Turkish about when 8 Relying on Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 63. 9 Bank of New Zealand v Trotter EC Auckland AC 36/07, 18 June 2007 at [13]. 10 Relying on Talbot v Air New Zealand Ltd [1994] 2 ERNZ 216; and see The Vice Chancellor of Massey University v Wrigley and Kelly [2010] NZEmpC 52. he started working for the company and in w...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 85 Wilson v Manukau Institute of Technology [pdf, 243 KB]

   BRIAN WILSON v MANUKAU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY [2021] NZEmpC 85 [11 June 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 85 EMPC 24/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of a challenge to objection to disclosure BETWEEN BRIAN WILSON Plaintiff AND MANUKAU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY De...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 16 Best Health Products Ltd v Nee [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...time of the offer exceeded $750 (excluding GST); and that the offer was unreasonably rejected so that Ms Nee incurred more costs in dealing with BHPL’s unsuccessful challenge. 16 Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] ERNZ 305 (CA) at [61]-[63], Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd [2002] 1 ERNZ 438 (CA) at [14]; Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly [2004] 1 ERNZ 172; (2004) 17 PRNZ 16 (CA) at [42] and Belsham v Ports of Auckland Ltd...

10. [2007] NZEmpC AC 24/07 Jeffries v Adis International Ltd [pdf, 47 KB]

    JEFFRIES V ADIS INTERNATIONAL LTD AK AC 24/07 15 May 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 24/07 ARC 61/05 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN ADAIR NITHSDALE JEFFRIES Plaintiff AND ADIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: Submissions received on 23 February 2007 and 19 March 2007 (Heard on the papers) Judgment: 15 May 2007 COSTS...