Search Results

1. Doria v Diamond Laser Medispa Taupo Ltd (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 50 [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN ZELINDA DORIA PLAINTIFF AND DIAMOND LASER MEDISPA TAUPO LIMITED FIRST DEFENDANT AND OLIVIA JANE BLAKENEY-WILLIAMS SECOND DEFENDANT AND RICHARD HUGH BLAKENEY-WILLIAMS THIRD DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms MA Roche, Co-Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms J Emerson for plaintiff Ms K McDonald for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISI...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 75 Bhikoo v Stephen Marr Hair Design Newmarket Ltd [pdf, 96 KB]

   MOBEEN BHIKOO v STEPHEN MARR HAIR DESIGN NEWMARKET LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 75 [16 June 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 75 EMPC 141/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN MOBEEN BHIKOO Plaintiff AND STEPHEN MARR HAIR DESIGN NEWMARKET LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By submissions file...

3. [2012] NZEmpC 203 Tinkler v Fugro PMS PTY Ltd & Pavement Management Services Ltd [pdf, 111 KB]

   BRYCE TINKLER V FUGRO PMS PTY LTD & PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 203 [6 December 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 203 ARC 98/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN BRYCE TINKLER Plaintiff AND FUGRO PMS PTY LTD & PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD Defendant ARC 30/12 AND IN THE...

4. Te Manutukutuku Issue 12 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...Commission which presented submissions on its role in transferring 10 percent quota under the Quota Management System (QMS) to iwi. The Tribunal also asked for overviews of the new evi­ dence from Professor Alan Ward, professor of history at the University of Newcastle, and Dr George Habib, fisheries consultant from Auckland. Both reviewers had already pre­ sented evidence before the Tribunal for the original claim. The task of reporting the original claim is so large that the Tribun...

5. [2018] NZEmpC 53 Ahuja v A Labour Inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 280 KB]

   NEELAM AHUJA, CHIRAG AHUJA AND RHYTHM AHUJA (RE KHOOBSURAT LIMITED) (IN LIQUIDATION) v A LABOUR INSPECTOR, MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 53 [22 May 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 53 EMPC 12/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of applications for costs BETWEEN NEELAM AHUJA, CHIRAG AHUJA AND RHYTHM...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 102 Tan v Morningstar Institute of Education Ltd t/a Morningstar Preschool [pdf, 77 KB]

   CATHERINE TAN v MORNININGSTAR INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION LIMITED T/A MORNINGSTAR PRESCHOOL NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 102 [5 June 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 102 ARC 43/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN CATHERINE TAN Plaintiff AND MORNININGSTAR INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION LIMITED T/A MORNINGSTAR PRESCHOOL...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 160 Nathan v C3 Ltd [pdf, 100 KB]

   ANDY NATHAN v C3 LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 160 [1 December 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 160 ARC 94/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN ANDY NATHAN Plaintiff AND C3 LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On papers filed on 30 September, 31 October and 11 November 2016 Representatives:...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 160 Shanmuganathan v PowerNet Ltd [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...were $17,341.90. Ms Copeland helpfully provided invoices which confirm the amount that PowerNet incurred for the purposes of the challenge. Having regard to my assessment of both 8 Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] ERNZ 305 (CA), Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd [2002] 1 ERNZ 438 (CA); Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly [2004] 1 ERNZ 172 (CA); and Belsham v Ports of Auckland Ltd [2014] NZCA 206, [2014] ERNZ 66. 9 Wills v...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 147 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...the Calderbank offers made in the Authority. The Court, for reasons explained in the judgment, declined to take into account the Calderbank offers made in the Authority. 18 [30] The approach taken in Kaipara and followed in O'Connor v University of Auckland Students’ Association Incorporated would appear to be consistent with that taken by the Australian Courts towards Calderbank offers. The rationale in that jurisdiction is that the proceedings on appeal are, in effect,...

10. [2021] NZEmpC 198 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 388 KB]

    ...parties tending to increase or contain costs”. [65] The principles as to costs are well established, as set out in several well-known Court of Appeal judgments.21 [66] The following summary from the Court of Appeal’s decision in Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee, explains the underlying factors which are relevant to an assessment of costs:22 [48] The primary principle is that costs follow the event. As to quantification, the principle is one of reasonable contrib...