Search Results

1. ZA v YB LCRO 164/2013 (31 August 2016) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...determination, has been to: (a) Consider all of the available material afresh, including the Committee’s decision; and (b) Provide an independent opinion based on those materials. Review Hearing [39] Mr [ZA] attended a review hearing in Auckland on 25 October 2015. Mr [YB] was not required to attend and the hearing proceeded in his absence. A copy of the audio of the hearing has been provided to both parties. Recusal Application [40] Mr [ZA] has sought my recusal. That is...

2. Appendix-7_Julia-Williams_s87F-Report_Natural-Character_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...request to Waka Kotahi from the Regional Councils and liaising with the Regional Councils’ terrestrial ecology and freshwater ecology experts post lodgement to evaluate effects on natural character. 8. I hold a Bachelor of Architecture degree (Auckland University) and a Postgraduate Diploma in Landscape Architecture (Lincoln College). I am a current certificate holder in the ‘Making Good Decisions’ Programme for Resource Management Act decision-makers. I am a Fellow of the...

3. OIA-119571.pdf [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...The need to understand the gendered patterns and dynamics involved in cases of this nature in order to provide an appropriate and effective response. 23. While noting the possible benefits of an offence of coercion and control, Julia R Tolmie of the University of Auckland has also warned of the difficulties of creating an offence of this nature,12 namely: a. Prosecuting the offence will necessitate a greater reliance on victim testimony and may require a breadth of evidence and complexity of...

4. 3-Strikes-Proactive-Release-OIA-Requests_Final_Part4.pdf [pdf, 14 MB]

   ...Noyce, Megan; Williams, Bruce; Ryland, Scott; Klinger, Sophie; Akomah, Chinwe; Mark, Alexandria; Smith, Harry Cc: Hippolite, Joy Subject: RIA Panel-Reinstating three strikes sentencing law When: Tuesday, 26 March 2024 2:00 pm-3:00 pm (UTC+12:00) Auckland, Wellington. Where: KS - 6-0 (16 pax) This meeting will be on Teams as no room is available. This is an invite to an RIA Panel to review the following: Authors: Sophie Klinger, Chinwe Akomah, Harry Smith, Alex Mark. Chair: Mega...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 142 Horton Media Ltd [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...cafeteria. When the meeting concluded, the company’s Christchurch manufacturing manager, Mr Peter Kelly, called Mr Hooper out to the front office where he met with Mr Kelly and Ms Natasha Dunbier, the company’s human resources manager from Auckland. Ms Dunbier informed Mr Hooper that they had reasonable cause to believe that he was consuming drugs during working hours and he was, therefore, required to undergo a drug test and give a urine sample. Mr Hooper said that he was gi...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 165 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 185 KB]

   JOHN MATSUOKA v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LTD NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 165 [4 September 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 165 ARC 23/12 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of applications for orders for discovery BETWEEN JOHN MATSUOKA Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LTD Defendant Hearing: 9 July 2013 By submissions filed on 12 and 15 July 2013 Appearances:...

7. [2025] NZEmpC 69  Bread of Life Christian Church in Auckland v Chen [pdf, 431 KB]

   BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND v XI (ROBERT) CHEN [2025] NZEmpC 69 [4 April 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 69 EMPC 141/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND Plaintiff AND XI (ROBERT) CHEN Defendant EMPC 181/2024 IN T

8. Gray v Tulip Holdings Ltd [pdf, 176 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00499 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN PETER WILLIAM GRAY and SUSAN FRANCES GRAY Claimants AND TULIP HOLDINGS LIMITED First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 8 & 9 November 2005 Appearances: Grant Shand for the Claimants No appearance by or on behalf of the First respondent John Bierre and Andrew Wedekind for the Fifth respondent Det

9. Hill v Whimp [pdf, 158 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 376 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JANICE LORRAINE and NOEL EWART HILL Claimants AND DIANNE and ROSS WHIMP First Respondents AND AKITA CONSTRUCTION LTD Second Respondent AND EUROBRIK PRODUCTS LTD Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent, Jeff Young Contractors Ltd having been struck out AND No Fifth Respondent, David John Follas having been struck out AND No Sixth Respon

10. [2018] NZEmpC 8 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...discretion, the Court may have regard to “any conduct of the parties tending to increase or contain costs”. [15] In their submissions, counsel referred to the well-established principles as set out in the Court of Appeal judgments of Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee;6 Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd 7 and Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly.8 4 At [235] – [236]. 5 At [244] – [246]. 6 Victoria University of Wellington v...