1675 items matching your search terms
ALA v ITE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 128 [26 October 2017] THERE IS AN ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES AND ANY INFORMATION LEADING TO THE PARTIES’ IDENTITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 128 EMPC 218/2017 IN THE MATTER OF an application for sanctions BETWEEN ALA Plaintiff AND ITE Defendant Hearing: 17 October 2017 (heard at Tauranga) Appearances: M Ward-Johnson, counsel fo...
...SUBJECT TO NON-PUBLICATION ORDER DECISION (PENALTY) Dated 3 November 2023 2 INTRODUCTION [1] UM, also known as [redacted], the appellant, was the highest bidder at an auction of a dairy/superette property in central Auckland (the property). The sale and purchase agreement (the agreement) was ultimately cancelled. She made a complaint to the Real Estate Agents Authority (the Authority), the first respondent. It was against both the agent, Ned Gow, the s...
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF UNITEC INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY V HENDERSON AK AC 12/07 19 March 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 12/07 ARC 92/05 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF UNITEC INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Plaintiff AND KATHLEEN JOAN HENDERSON Defendant Hearing: 12, 13 and 14 June 2006 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Emma Butcher, Counsel for Plaintiff Christopher Pa...
...for refugee matters) • companies or groups of people (except in some cases) • reviews by Work and Income (but legal aid is available for you to appeal their review decision to the Social Security Appeal Authority) • problems with schools, universities and other educational institutions (such as suspension meetings before a school Board of Trustees). Applying for legal aid You should apply for legal aid as soon as you have been charged or received a summons to appear in court. D...
VILLEGAS V VISYPAK (NZ) LTD AK 23 November 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2010] NZEMPC 154 ARC 49/10 IN THE MATTER OF a de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JONITO VILLEGAS Plaintiff AND VISYPAK (NZ) LTD Defendant Hearing: 28 October 2010 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Greg Lloyd, counsel for the plaintiff Garry Pollak, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 23 November 2010 JUDGMENT OF...
...& Allen, R. (2022). How we fail children who offend and what to do about it: ‘A breakdown across the whole system’. Research and recommendations. Auckland, NZ: The Michael and Suzanne Borrin Foundation, the New Zealand Law Foundation & the University of Auckland. Document 4 s9(2)(f)(iv) s9(2)(f)(iv) s9(2)(f)(iv) s9(2)(f)(iv) Out of scope ■ ■ ■ 2 The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child has recommended New Zealand increase the minimum age of...
...(as compared to urban stormwater) typically has low concentrations of microbiological contamination due to low loading and bacteria die-off between rain events. This was discussed in paragraph 117 of Water Quality - Technical Assessment C. 3. Auckland Regional Council (2003) records contaminant loading for various land uses. The loading of faecal coliforms from roads was estimated to be 1.8 x108 cfu/ha/year which is considerably lower than pasture (1.6 x1010 cfu/ha/year) or bush...
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONALS AND EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES INC v COUNTIES MANUKAU DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2020] NZEmpC 99 [6 July 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 99 EMPC 258/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONALS AND EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES INC Plaintiff AND COUN...
...NZREADT 14 Reference No: READT 008/2022 IN THE MATTER OF Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 2107 AGAINST MICHAEL SHELDON Defendant Hearing in Auckland on 23 May 2023 Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) P N O’Connor (Member) F J Mathieson (Member) Appearances: Counsel for the Committee: E Mok Counsel for Mr Sheldon: R B Hern SUBJECT TO NON-PUBLICATIO...
...“denying me my interpreter of choice”. [90] In terms of the Rules, this is properly described as an alleged breach of r 12 of the Rules, which provides as follows: 16 Ms FC’s letter (23 October 2020) at [7]. 17 Simpson v Gilmour HC Auckland CIV-2008-404-008674, 29 October 2009. 15 12 A lawyer must, when acting in a professional capacity, conduct dealings with others, including self-represented persons, with integrity, respect and courtesy. [91] Ms FC’s precise a...