LCRO 81/2018 QQ v RR (26 November 2019) [pdf, 548 KB]
...from that procedural defect was not fair to Mrs RR or Mr QQ. The process from then on was tainted by that procedural unfairness. It appears from the decision under review that the Committee was swayed by the blended narrative, and Mrs RR’s pleas for clemency and charity. It is accepted that Mrs RR found herself in the unenviable position of many an unsuccessful litigant. She lost. The Court set the 2010 agreement aside. Based on an overall consideration of the available ma...