Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Anderson [2022] NZLCDT 25 (22 July 2022) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...available to him and of which Ms Anderson expected him to avail himself. As indicated before, he had an in-house lawyer who was at the time undertaking a review of Mr R’s company and trust structures, which would have included the new corporate vehicle under which he was the director and sole shareholder to repurchase the property. [46] For this reason, we do not find that the Standards Committee has established misconduct in Ms Anderson’s professional capacity, in relation...

2. DH v WU LCRO 219 / 2010 (29 June 2011) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...[44] Ms C has exercised her right to use the front portion of the driveway which serves the Applicant’s unit, and, in the circumstances which have arisen, the potential exists for his privacy to be compromised both in terms of the possibility of vehicles passing his unit, and also his being unable to fence off the “boundary” between the two units. [45] Property rights and privacy are important, and the Applicant was concerned to find out that these had been compromised. The use...

3. Statistical bulletin: An overview of conviction and sentencing statisitcs in New Zealand 2000 to 2009 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...in 2009. Offences against justice increased from 16 percent of the total in 2008 to 18 percent in 2009. 5 ‘Driving under the influence of alcohol or other substance’ and ‘dangerous or negligent operation of a vehicle’ are included in the offence category ‘Dangerous acts’, rather than ‘Traffic’. STATISTICAL BULLETIN: CONVICTION AND SENTENCING STATISTICS 6 Figure 5: Proportion of convicted charges, by offence...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 197 Otago Regional Council v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 982 KB]

   ...https://2gp.dunedin.govt.nz/plan/pages/plan/book.aspx?hid=1367 6 4. stormwater management systems; 5. establishment, enhancement, or retention of vegetation; 6. design of earthworks; and 7. the location and design of driveways and vehicle tracks. 6. Amend Rule 11.7.2 as follows: 11.7.2 Assessment of non-complying activities Activity Guidance on the assessment of resource consents 1. In the hazard 1 (flood) Overlay Zones: • Natural hazards potentially sen...

5. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Evidence - Michael Moore [pdf, 7.5 MB]

   ...with reference to the following explicit scales and their common English meanings: Nature of effect  Positive  Neutral  Adverse Magnitude of effect  Highly significant  Significant  Moderate  Minor  Negligible MWM-008 8 BI-309448-3-497-V2 Landscape effects assessment Value and sensitivity of the landscape 20. I assess Porteous Hill as having moderate – high landscape value. It is not identified as an outstandin...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 009 Goodwin v Wellington City Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...Plan’s definition of Recreation Activity. This definition is “…any activity whose primary aim is the passive or active enjoyment of leisure, whether competitive or non-competitive, casual or organised, (but does not include the use of motor vehicles in Conservation Sites or Open Space Areas). Recreation has a corresponding meaning”. • The activity status of the resource consent application is a Discretionary Activity (Unrestricted). • In terms of the consents require...

7. [2018] NZEmpC 79 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [pdf, 513 KB]

   ...information was obtained by email from Maritime New Zealand, and from Princess Cruises and its shipping agent. Mr Gordon also obtained weather and sea condition information, stills from various cameras around EPL, purchase records for fuel for the vehicle that Captain Hines used, and documentation regarding the arrival and departure of the two vessels in question. [43] The camera stills did not support Captain Hines’ version of events, and the fuel purchase records did...

8. People with finalised charges and convicted of family violence offences December 2023 [xlsx, 137 KB]

   ...cause injury 13,889 14,781 15,295 14,682 14,482 15,694 12,660 13,208 14,065 52% 50% 52% 51% 49% 50% 48% 47% 46% 03: Sexual assault and related offences 1,761 2,009 1,704 1,752 1,653 1,767 1,990 2,603 2,682 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 8% 9% 9% 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 214 147 187 191 200 233 185 282 228 1% <1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 05: Abduction, harassment and other offences against the person 2,432 2,797 2,757 2,856 2,927 3,353 2,782 3,241 3,549 9% 10% 9% 10% 10% 11% 11%...

9. Family-violence-offences-jun2022-v1.0.xlsx [xlsx, 132 KB]

   ...02: Acts intended to cause injury 13,127 14,667 15,108 14,847 14,277 14,844 15,645 12,103 52% 51% 52% 52% 50% 49% 49% 47% 03: Sexual assault and related offences 1,637 2,004 1,799 1,759 1,606 1,679 2,129 2,107 6% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 7% 8% 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 192 134 169 184 202 205 250 219 1% <1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 05: Abduction, harassment and other offences against the person 2,240 2,617 2,862 2,700 2,872 3,065 3,312 2,931 9% 9% 10% 9% 10% 10% 10% 11% 06: Rob...

10. People with finalised charges and convicted of family violence offences jun2024 [xlsx, 143 KB]

    ...injury 13,127 14,666 15,111 14,841 14,279 14,841 15,636 12,110 13,322 14,302 52% 51% 52% 52% 50% 49% 49% 47% 46% 46% 03: Sexual assault and related offences 1,637 2,004 1,795 1,758 1,608 1,678 2,114 2,111 2,689 3,022 6% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 192 134 169 184 202 205 250 225 256 224 1% <1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 05: Abduction, harassment and other offences against the person 2,240 2,617 2,863 2,700 2,872 3,064 3,304 2,931 3,303 3,68...