Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 178 KB]
...also pointed out that the claimants had no contract with EMPA. [11] Mr Sherwood-King on behalf of the claimant Trust opposed the application on the grounds that the bank is a significant issue. He submitted that Mr Blades was involved in the design stages of the house and on site during the dwelling’s construction, and so any removal would be premature. He cited the evidence of Mr Taylor, a chartered professional engineer, as the basis of the claim against EMPA. He also point...