Search Results

1. 2021-03-23 Transcript (up to Mr McIndoe on day 10) [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Judg

2. 2021-04-13 Transcript (up to end of day 15) [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...sets of priorities and specifically require the applicants to identify whether they utilise their priorities within that subset and whether they want them to carry over as part of the application process and so that would allow some kind of 10 reconciliation and sifting out of areas where they’re not being used, so only those where they’re being used and the applicants want them to carry over, then they would be carried over. Does that make sense? Q. Mmm. A. And so that’s...

3. OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL NOE [pdf, 6.6 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju

4. 2021-03-26 Transcript (up to end of day 11) [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Judg

5. 2021-04-20 Transcript (up to end of day 17) [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...sets of priorities and specifically require the applicants to identify whether they utilise their priorities within that subset and whether they want them to carry over as part of the application process and so that would allow some kind of 10 reconciliation and sifting out of areas where they’re not being used, so only those where they’re being used and the applicants want them to carry over, then they would be carried over. Does that make sense? Q. Mmm. A. And so that’s...

6. Transcript - Hearing - PC7 8 - 26 March [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju

7. Transcript - Hearing - PC7 - 8 to 26 March 2021 [updated] [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju

8. 2021-04-21 Transcript (up to end of day 19) [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...sets of priorities and specifically require the applicants to identify whether they utilise their priorities within that subset and whether they want them to carry over as part of the application process and so that would allow some kind of 10 reconciliation and sifting out of areas where they’re not being used, so only those where they’re being used and the applicants want them to carry over, then they would be carried over. Does that make sense? Q. Mmm. A. And so that’s...

9. 2021-04-21 Transcript (up to end of day 19) [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...sets of priorities and specifically require the applicants to identify whether they utilise their priorities within that subset and whether they want them to carry over as part of the application process and so that would allow some kind of 10 reconciliation and sifting out of areas where they’re not being used, so only those where they’re being used and the applicants want them to carry over, then they would be carried over. Does that make sense? Q. Mmm. A. And so that’s...

10. 2021-04-21 Transcript (up to end of day 20) [pdf, 5.9 MB]

    ...sets of priorities and specifically require the applicants to identify whether they utilise their priorities within that subset and whether they want them to carry over as part of the application process and so that would allow some kind of 10 reconciliation and sifting out of areas where they’re not being used, so only those where they’re being used and the applicants want them to carry over, then they would be carried over. Does that make sense? Q. Mmm. A. And so that’s...