Search Results

1. Waikato-and-Waipa-River-Iwi.pdf [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...(ENV-2020- AKL-96); (o) DairyNZ Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-97); (p) Wairakei Pastoral Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-98); (q) Beef & Lamb NZ Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-99); (r) Auckland Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Council v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-101); (s) Federated Farmers of NZ Inc v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL- 102); (t) Landcorp Farming Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-147); (u) Pukekohe Vegetable Growers Assn v WRC (ENV-2020- AKL-148); and (v) Lochiel Farmlands Limited v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL- 1...

2. 2017 NZSSAA 039 (20 July 2017) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...2 years continuous residence in NZ Article 8 has no bearing on her case. Article 10 – rate of New Zealand [Supported Living Payment] in Australia [44] Article 10 of the Order introduces further qualifications to the receipt of SLPO. Article 10.1 provides a formula for calculating an Australian resident’s entitlement to SLP. The formula uses the concept of ‘working age residence in New Zealand’, defined in Article 5.5 of the Order as: … a period of residence between the...

3. LCRO 3/2016 RC and RD v ZC (30 June 2017) [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...writing on the principal aspects of client service, including the basis on which the fees will be charged. (iv) Whether Mr ZC breached rule 9 … by charging fees that were unfair and unreasonable. (v) Whether Mr ZC breached rule 3.1 and/or rule 10.1 … by failing to treat his clients and/or vendor’s lawyer with respect and courtesy, and by being dishonest. The Standards Committee determination [16] The Standards Committee determined to take no further action on any of the c...

4. [2023] NZEmpC 225 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...Pecuniary penalties are due [16] The parties agree that pecuniary penalties are properly payable by the defendants, and there is a great deal of commonality in the approach that they say 8 GF v Comptroller, New Zealand Customs Service [2023] NZEmpC 101, [2023] ERNZ 409 at [162]. ought to be adopted. There is a vast difference in view, however, as to the appropriate level of penalties.9 [17] The purposes of penalties are:10 (a) to punish those who breach minimum emp...

5. Tamou v Smith - Sections 57, 58, 70, 72 and 100 of the Ratana Pa (2016) 361 Aotea MB 75 (361 AOT 75) [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...adherents of the Ratana Movement, not being beneficial owners of land vested in the Board, or, where the said President is not a beneficial owner, two such 1 356 Aotea MB 282 (356 AOT 282) 2 101 Whanganui MB 342-343 (101 WG 342-343) 3 Māori Purposes Act 1941, s 14(3) 361 Aotea MB 77 adherents, who shall be nominated by other adherents of the Movement who are not beneficial owners: (d) Two officers of the Public Se...

6. Write Off Application Form [pdf, 514 KB]

   ...Benefit woman alone before 15 July 2013: undefined_5: undefined_6: undefined_8: undefined_9: undefined_11: undefined_12: undefined_14: undefined_15: undefined_17: undefined_18: undefined_20: Write your number here: fill_98: fill_101: or: fill_103: or_2: 15a For your current main job complete details below: tax: fill_108: or_3: fill_110: or_4: undefined_34: undefined_39: undefined_44: undefined_49: undefined_54: undefined_59: undefined_...

7. EMPC Document bundle example [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...their gross salary or wage. The Employee contribution will be deducted from the Employee's pay. For further information regarding employee and employer contributions to KiwiSaver, visit http://www.kiwisaver.govt.nz. 10 Health and Safety 10.1 General Health and Safety Obligations Both the Employer and the Employee shall comply with their obligations under the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992. This includes the Employer taking all practicable steps to provide the Emplo...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 224 Medina Trading Ltd T/A Hotel Debrett v Hunter [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...which has been effectively superseded by more recent authorities. Ultimately, he submits that if a plaintiff wishes to challenge only part of a determination, a non-de novo challenge ought to have been filed. Legal principles [11] Section 10(1) of the Legislation Act 2019 states: “The meaning of legislation must be ascertained from its text and in the light of its purpose and its context.” [12] The parties disagree over the meaning of s 179 of the Act: 179 Challenges to d...

9. Wright v CAC 10056 & Woods [2011] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...boundary details. [5] Ms Wright said that she showed the Woods (the complainants) around the property on Sunday 11th April. They saw the property twice on this day. She affirmed that the aerial photograph (bundle of documents appellant page 101) was available at the viewing. [6] She said that she told the Woods that she did not know where the boundary was but that the car pad and driveway were on council land. She asserted that she told the Woods that not all of the grass on...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 272 Auckland Council v Eco Earth NZ Limited [pdf, 247 KB]

    ...complete the remediation works according to the timeframe specified in the RAP. Site validation 9. Within one month of the completion of remediation works, provide a Site Validation Report (SVR) to Auckland Council. 10. The SVR shall: 10.1 Set out the remediation works completed, 10.2 Confirm that the remediation works were completed in accordance with the RAP, 10.3 Be certified by a suitably qualified and experienced CPEng Geotechnical Engineer, and 5 10....