Search Results

1. Nicholas v Gibbons - Poike 8E [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 68 (2019 APPEAL 68) [pdf, 408 KB]

   ...Subject to what happens at the next hearing, I intend at this stage to vest the legal interests in the trustees of the Poike 8E Trust; 1 The Māori Trustee – Poike 8E block (2015) 101 Waikato Maniapoto MB 286-311 (101 WAI 286-311). 2 Nicholas – Poike 8E (2018) 162 Waikato Maniapoto MB 90 (162 WAI 90) at [97]-[98]. 2019 Māori Appellate Court MB 70 (d) Section 237 dismissing application A20170006831, being an ap...

2. Smith v Courtney - Ohuirua No 2 [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 284 (2011 APPEAL 284) [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...dated 30 November 2009, Judge Ambler dismissed the application. A factor which weighed heavily with the Lower Court was that two­ thirds of the owners opposed the easements. Only one other owner supported the appellant - between them they held 10.1 shares out of30 shares. [4] A further factor in the Lower Court's decision to dismiss the application was the view that the development of general land is not a primary objective of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 ("TTWMA")....

3. Auckland 356 Complaints Committee and Auckland No. 1 Standards Committee v Sanders [2010] NZLCDT 21 [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...Authority was reduced to writing and/or signed by Mr P on 15 November 2006 with Mr P signing on behalf of himself and Mrs P. (“the Complaints Committee Representation Charge”) [e] That from, on, and after 23 June 2008, in breach of Section 101(6) of the Law Practitioners Act 1982, without lawful justification or excuse he refused or failed, and continued to refuse or fail, to comply with the lawful requirement of Complaints Committee No.1 of the Auckland District Law Society mad...

4. MOJ0344.2M_factsheet_Affected-by-crime_Nov22_MAO_WEB.pdf [pdf, 656 KB]

   ...Waea atu ki te Waea Mōhiohio Pārurenga ki 0800 650 654 ki te rapu mōhiohio mō ērā atu tari tautoko i tō takiwā. E oti pea i a koe te riro tautoko nō Te Kaporeihana Āwhina Hunga Whara (ACC) – waea atu te Nama Waea Āwhina a ACC ki 0800 101 996. Mō ngā kerēme e hāngai ana ki te taitōkai, tēnā waea atu ki te Nama Waea mō ngā Kerēme Pāwera ki 0800 735 566. TE TAIHARA TAIOHI Mēnā nā tētahi taiohi i raro i te pakeke 17 tau te taihara, ka whakaritea te take mā te...

5. [2024] NZSSAA 01 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...XXXX is summarised as follows: 14.1 As a starting point the text is to be considered in light of its purpose and context.4 14.2 The following accepted principles of statutory interpretation are also relevant: 4 Legislation Act 2019, s 10(1). 4 (a) When the matter directly impacts on a person’s rights and interests, as in XXXX’s case, a generous and fair approach should be taken.5 (b) In relation to benefit legislation, the Court has explicitly held that th...

6. Rendell v Attorney-General [2024] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...response to his request. The delay by the Police in making the document available to Mr Rendell raises an additional issue for the Tribunal to determine. ISSUES [10] To determine the claim, the Tribunal must consider the following issues: [10.1] Whether the Police were entitled to withhold the NIA transaction logs of times, dates and identification details of Police employees who accessed Mr Rendell’s personal information, under s 27(1)(c) of the Act on the basis that to release...

7. LCRO 70/2018 AR v NM (10 April 2019) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...unfair advantage of them”.32 27 Property (Relationships) Act 1976, s 42(3). 28 See JQ v QM LCRO 97/2011 (28 August 2012) at [23]. 29 EO and EP v VO LCRO 240/2010 (3 August 2011) at [7], [49] — rule 10.1 which requires that “[a] lawyer must treat other lawyers with respect and courtesy” was perhaps the relevant rule concerning the lawyer not responding to another lawyer’s correspondence. 30 GE Dal Pont Lawyers’ Professional Res...

8. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML rebuttal Robert Pryor [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...clear understanding of the landscape (and visual) values of the existing environment. I agree this is standard practice and note that this is in accordance with the NZILA’s Best Practice Note: Landscape Assessment and Sustainable Management 10.1 (2010). 7. In her opinion, in paragraph 14, she considers that the landscape description that underpins my landscape and visual effects assessment is deficient in that it does not address the following landscape matters which she cons...

9. Waikato and Waipā River Iwi.pdf [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...(ENV-2020- AKL-96); (o) DairyNZ Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-97); (p) Wairakei Pastoral Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-98); (q) Beef & Lamb NZ Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-99); (r) Auckland Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Council v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-101); (s) Federated Farmers of NZ Inc v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL- 102); (t) Landcorp Farming Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-147); (u) Pukekohe Vegetable Growers Assn v WRC (ENV-2020- AKL-148); and (v) Lochiel Farmlands Limited v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL- 1...

10. Tatere v Hauraki - Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C No 1 (2021) 93 Tākitimu MB 135 (93 TKT 135) [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...Hauraki retained Mr Meroiti for further assistance in relation to whakapapa and tikanga, research related to a BNZ mortgage, livestock reconciliation and research into the Waimarama lease. 9 36 Takitimu MB 43 (36 TKT 43). 10 44 Takitimu MB 46-101 (44 TKT 46-101). 93 Tākitimu MB 141 (d) Mr Hauraki identified debts that existed between the Ngawapurua Trust, the Tatere Partnership and Rua Roa Trust. In his report dated 20 May 2015, Mr Hauraki stated that the former t...