Search Results

1. E44 Richard Simonds - Groundwater - EIC - Council [pdf, 753 KB]

   ...attached to the planning evidence of Nicola Broadbent for the Council. 9.5 As noted above, I consider that the contingency and mitigation measures described in the updated GWMCP attached to Mr Grant’s evidence are appropriate. 10. CONCLUSIONS 10.1 The Applicant has undertaken an appropriate scope of on-site geotechnical investigations and provided appropriate and suitably conservative geotechnical and groundwater level data and on the basis of this data has undertaken an adequa...

2. EU v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 181 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...the respondent’s vehicle by other drivers. Further the respondent claims the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence of damage to his vehicle or that his vehicle was rendered undrivable by the tar and chip on his tyres. [7] Under section 10(1)(c) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear claim in tort resulting in the destruction or loss of property, or damage or injury to property, or the recovery of property. [8] For a negligence action to suc...

3. MOJ0047.03 When someone dies suddenly factsheet [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...detail. The case manager will be available as an ongoing contact until the inquiry is complete, however long that process takes. Support available ACC provides financial support if a family or whānau member has died from an accident. Freephone: 0800 101 996. Website: acc. co.nz/im-injured/financial-support/financial-support-after-death After a Suicide provides an online support service run by the Mental Health Foundation for families and whānau affected by suicide. Website: afterasuici...

4. Three strikes offences December 2020 [xlsx, 114 KB]

   ...2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 911 1,310 1,333 1,275 1,291 1,424 1,506 1,519 1,299 1,184 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Gender Female 75 110 105 103 92 127 127 154 136 101 8% 8% 8% 8% 7% 9% 8% 10% 10% 9% Male 835 1,199 1,225 1,172 1,198 1,296 1,379 1,363 1,161 1,082 92% 92% 92% 92% 93% 91% 92% 90% 89% 91% Unknown 1 1 3 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 <1% <1% <1% 0% <1% <1% 0% <1% <1% <1%...

5. Mercury NZ Limited [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...period applicable for Mercury is 50 working days from 28 April 2020.2 5 The parts of the Decision that Mercury is appealing are: 5.1 Policy 11; 5.2 Policy 12; 5.3 Policy 13; 5.4 Table 3.11-2; 5.5 Consequential Amendments: (a) Rule 4.2.10.1(n); (b) 4.3.3 Policy 1; and (c) 5.2.3 Policy 2. 6 Overall, Mercury is interested in issues that may affect its ability to operate, maintain, upgrade and develop its renewable electricity generation assets, particularly its present...

6. Stewart v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on discontinuance of appeal) [2023] NZACC 108 [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...Submissions were then filed by the Corporation, including noting that Ms Koloni, by that point, was already in receipt of judgments of this Court identifying absence of jurisdiction. 1 Stewart v Accident Compensation Corporation [2022] NZACC 101. 3 (e) In February 2023, the matter was set down for hearing to occur on 11 May 2023. A Minute dated 24 February 2023 was issued. (f) In accordance with the Practice Guidelines, it was for the appellant to prepare the required bun...

7. Wider-stakeholders-feedback-summary.pdf [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...considered the draft code and the process of drafting it a failure because they felt the code was watered down and lacks tangible enforcement mechanisms. 10. Most submitters thought that the voluntary, self-regulating nature of the draft code: 10.1. makes it ineffective with no enforcement or accountability, and does nothing to address areas of significant public concern; 10.2. does not promote public trust in the system; 10.3. undermines democracy and encourages corruption; 10....

8. District-Court-Electronic-Filing-Amendment-Rules-2023.pdf [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...considered and agreed it would be desirable to permanently enable electronic filing provisions within the District Court Rules 2014. The Committee has agreed these provisions should be consistent with rule 5.1A and rule 5.1B of the High Court Rules 2016: 10.1 Rule 5.1A: allows for documents to be filed electronically (and allows a Judge or Associate Judge to require that documents be filed electronically in emergencies), including provision for electronic signatures. An electronic addre...

9. E37 Gemma Chuah - Stormwater - EIC - Council [pdf, 767 KB]

   ...incorporated into the revised set of conditions attached to Nicola Broadbent’s planning evidence for the Council – I consider that proposed conditions 136 to 150 appropriately deal with stormwater and ITA-related matters. 10. CONCLUSIONS 10.1 In relation to ITAs the implementation of the proposed structural and procedural controls and careful ongoing management of the bases will ensure that any effects on the environment as a result of the activities on the bases will be suit...

10. Baker v High Court (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 696 KB]

    ...defendants (the Commissioner of Inland Revenue and the Attorney-General) now apply for an award of $3,000 as a reasonable contribution towards their costs. Their actual costs before the Tribunal totalled $5,584.55 (excl GST) with disbursements of $10.14 (excl GST). Costs and disbursements in line with the High Court Rules on a 1B basis would amount to $4,462.14. [3] The application is opposed by the plaintiff. [4] By Minute dated 21 December 2021 the Chairperson gave timetable direct...