Search Results

Search results for 101.

4530 items matching your search terms

  1. Beattie v Porirua City Council [2010] NZWHT Wellington 14 [pdf, 41 KB]

    SUMMARY Case: Beattie v Porirua City Council - INTERIM DECISION File No: TRI 2010-101-000009/ DBH 06006 Citation: [2010] NZWHT Wellington 14 Court: WHT Adjudicator: C Ruthe Date of Decision: 14 May 2010 Background Pursuant to sections 72 and 73 of the WHRS Act 2006, the Tribunal heard and determined the claim against the sixth respondent, Ms Donaldson separately. Ms Donaldson did not pursue a removal application as it was unlikely to succeed due to the requirements for...

  2. [2014] NZEmpC 217 Brake v Grace Team Accounting Ltd [pdf, 13 KB]

    ...granted. The appeal has now been heard by the Court of Appeal and the appeal was dismissed. [2] In addition to an order staying execution of the judgments of the Court the defendant was ordered to pay the monetary awards against it totalling $101,000 to the Registrar of the Employment Court at Auckland. That payment was then to be placed by the Registrar into an interest-bearing account. The funds were to be held by the Registrar until further order of the Court giving directions...

  4. Chen v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 31 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2008-101-74, 103, 104, 105, 112 and 113 BETWEEN SHYH JYE CHEN First Claimant STEPHANIE KAREN DAPHNE HERBISON and CATHARINE ANNE HERBISON as TRUSTEES OF THE HERBISON FAMILY TRUST Second, Third & Fourth Claimants BODY CORPORATE 7822 Fifth Claimant INTERCITY COMMERCIAL LIMITED Sixth Claimant AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND PETER BEAVEN ARCHITECT LIMITED Second Respondent (Remove...

  5. BORA Taxation (Annual Rates, Business Taxation, Kiwisaver, and Remedial Matters) Bill [pdf, 387 KB]

    ...essentially two-fold: whether the provision serves an important and significant objective; and whether there is a rational and proportionate connection between the provision and the objective.[1] Compulsory employer contributions 9. New section 101B of the KiwiSaver Act 2006 requires employers to make compulsory employee contributions to a KiwiSaver scheme or complying superannuation fund to match an employee's contributions deducted from their gross salary or wages. New section 10...

  6. [2021] NZEnvC 019 Summerset Villages (Lower Hutt Limited) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...(Lower Hutt) Limited Date of Decision: 5 March 2021 Date of Issue: 5 March 2021 DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON COSTS An order for costs is made in favour of the Crown against Summerset Villages (Lower Hutt) Limited for the sum of $101,513.49 (incl. GST)). REASONS Introduction [1] On 31 October 2018 a direct referral application by Summerset Villages (Lower Hutt) Ltd was filed for resource consents to develop and use a site situated at 32A Hathaway Avenue, Boulco...

  7. [2024] NZEmpC 107 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor [pdf, 164 KB]

    ...consent. They are: (a) That $5,000 be transferred into the first respondent’s ANZ “Eric’s Go” account to allow him to meet expenses permitted by the freezing orders. (b) The phrase “potential customers” of the applicant, under paragraph 10.1 of the ancillary orders, is deemed to include any person that the applicant could undertake services for in its normal course of business. (c) Paragraph 10.2 of the ancillary orders is amended to include emails sent by eric@pacifi...

  8. Pontypridd v Renfrewshire LCRO 9 / 2010 (12 April 2010) [pdf, 76 KB]

    ...each other. Certain events led to each of the lawyers becoming involved in lodging a complaint against the other to the New Zealand Law Society. This review relates only to the Standards Committee determination that the Applicant breached Rule 10.1 of the Lawyers Conduct and Client Care Rules. [2] The Standards Committee determined the complaint on 21 December 2009. On that same day the Applicant and Respondent, and their respective clients, appear to have reached agreement...

  9. Ormsby v Ormsby - Aorangi B No.1A No. 3 [2018] Maori Appellate Court MB 547 (2018 APPEAL 547) [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...Gilling also sought to adduce further evidence. For reasons that are set out below, even though such an application should have been filed at the time the notice of 1 163 Waikato Maniapoto MB 97-101 (163 WMN 97-101) 2 163 Waikato Maniapoto MB 97-101 (163 WMN 97-101) at 99 3 Ibid 4 Memorandum of Counsel – Request to join Co-Appellants, dated 8 October 2018 5 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 558 (2018 CJ 558) 2018 Māori Appellate Cou...

  10. Brodav Ltd v Waters [pdf, 50 KB]

    SUMMARY Case: Brodav Limited & Cook Family Trust v Waters & Ors File No: TRI 2008-101-000059 & 66/ DBH 05513 & 05488 Court: WHT Adjudicator: CB Ruthe Date of Decision: 31 March 2009 Background This determination deals with the liability of the ninth respondent, Mr Collings (bricklayer) in regards to the claim filed by Brodav Limited. It also looks at the meaning of “bad faith” under section 91 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 i...