Search Results

1. [2023] NZEmpC 16 Bird v Vice-Chancellor of the University of Waikato [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...policy reasons for this are to increase speedy and non-legalistic decision- making, to keep costs down, and avoid delays. Those matters are prioritised over any temporary impact on a party caused by a procedural determination. 15 Section 101. 16 Section 143(d). 17 Section 237(d). 18 Employment Relations Authority v Rawlings [2008] NZCA 15, [2008] ERNZ 26 at [23] and [26]; and H v A Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 92, [2014] ERNZ 38 at [17]. [18] Access to justice consid...

2. Tanetinorau - Hauturu East 8 (2003) 122 Otorohanga MB 22 (122 OT 22) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Trust to be known as Te Aue Tanetinorau Whanau Trust with the tDpuna being Te Aue Tanetinorau. There is an order under Section 222/93 appointing the following persons as trustees: Kevin Archer of 32 Arnold Street, Cambridge Adrienne MacPherson of 101 Armstrong Avenue, Te Awamutu Mere Kohe-Love of Tumu Tumu Road, R D 5, Te Kuiti Tauaroha Holden of 20 Beatty Street, Hamilton Warren John Holden of Tumu Tumu Road, R D 5, Te Kuiti COpy TO: A01-5622 Minute Book: 122 OT 28 The...

3. Guo v REAA & Jackman [2013] NZREADT 1 [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...registered as an architect with the New Zealand Board of Architects. Such a misconception in the mind of a purchaser could lead to that purchaser paying a much higher price than otherwise for property and that type of possibility must be eliminated. [101] It should be clear from our above coverage and analysis of the relevant conduct of the said eight licensees that we do not think that their respective conduct in issue amounts to unsatisfactory conduct in terms of s.72 of the Act. To...

4. Pera v Broomfield-Hoet -Tuhuna 16B (2021) 229 Taitokerau MB 190 (229 TTK 190) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...Reservation Regulations 1994 requires the trustees to hold an AGM. This provision does not expressly address whether a meeting can be held 2 COVID-19 Response (Requirements for Entities-Modifications and Exemptions) Act 2020, s 4(1)(m). 3 Ibid, s 10(1)(a). Note s 10 has been repealed as at 1 April 2021 but applied at the time of the 2020 AGM. 229 Taitokerau MB 193 electronically. It does provide that the trustees must give notice of the time and place of the meetin...

5. Opai - Kohatutaka 6A10D2C (2014) 93 Taitokerau MB 6 (93 TTK 6) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...application by the children of Ngārui Harris (an owner) was held in 2002. The applicants originally filed consents from 18 owners or beneficiaries of an estate associated with the land. Rahiri Hone Papita Harris is the largest shareholder with 101.67 shares (equating to approximately 93 Taitokerau MB 8 8.5000ha) and he objected to aspects of this application. In 2002, however, most of the other owners supported the application. [4] After the application was filed, a lett...

6. Ross and Ellis v Te Moni - Otumoko B4 (2010) 2 Waikato Maniapoto MB 243 (2 WMN 243) [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...(In liq) v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2002] 3 NZLR 648. [25] As the party entitled to exclusive possession of the land, the lessee is entitled to exclude all other persons, including an owner from the premises – Radaich v Smith (1959) 101 CLR 209. 2 Waikato Maniapoto MB 248 [26] An action for recovery of land turns upon the right to possession. In this case, the party entitled to possession of the land are the trustees of the Ellis Family Trust namely Mahaki E...

7. [2015] NZSSAA 83 (13 November 2015) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...refugees being allocated state housing, but there are a number of factors which go into the allocation of state housing. Simply being a refugee is not a criteria which results in automatic qualification. Assessment of 2014 application [16] Section 101 of the Housing Restructuring and Tenancy Matters Act 1992 authorises the Ministry of Social Development to manage applications for social housing, including assessing the eligibility of prospective tenants to be allocated social housing...

8. Waxman v Pal (Costs) [2017] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...for lost wages. As it is clear such claim is not ordinarily considered to be a disbursement for the purpose of a costs award we do not 3 intend addressing this issue further. The main points made by Dr Waxman (and our response) follow: [10.1] None of the defence witnesses were summonsed to attend the hearing. This, however, is irrelevant. It is not a precondition to an award of witness expenses that the witness first be served with a witness summons. [10.2] Not all the claim...

9. Mr M v CAC 20004 & Lewin & Lewin [2013] NZREADT 63 [pdf, 89 KB]

   [2013] NZREADT 63 READT 101/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MR M Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC20004) First Respondent AND ALLAN AND NOELINE LEWIN Second Respondent BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Mr G Denley – Member Ms N Dangen – Member APPEARANCES Mr McAnally and Ms Hojabri for the...

10. Proactive release – report on overseas travel (Europe – January 2019) [pdf, 840 KB]

    ...health: 9.1. Remove abortion from the Crimes Act 1961 and amend review the Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act 1977; 9.2 Address disparities in service provision, with an emphasis on access to vulnerable groups. 10. Theme Ten: Violence: 10.1. Continue efforts to combat gender based violence and domestic violence and discrimination against women, and children; IN-CONFIDENCE Page 5 of 6 3m1jqyn2tm 2019-04-09 12:18:07RE LE AS ED B Y TH E M IN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E...