Search Results

1. LCRO 168/2017 AH v OS and VI (21 December 2018) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...2014) <www.lawsociety.org.nz> at 3, 8. 19 JQ v QM LCRO 97/2011 (28 August 2012) at [23]. 20 Oxford English Dictionary <www.oed.com> — see also lawyers’ duties of “respect and courtesy” owed to clients (r 3.1), and other lawyers (r 10.1). 21 EO & EP v VO LCRO 240/2010 (August 2011) at [7], [49] — see also r 10.1 which requires that “[a] lawyer must treat other lawyers with respect and courtesy”. 17 [99] He says when he first complained, had the firm ack...

2. People with finalised charges and convicted of psychoactive substances December 2023 [xlsx, 99 KB]

   ...(38 charges). Number of charges Percentage of offence type total Offence type Charge outcome 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Sale and/or supply Convicted 32 159 109 122 101 84 71 21 19 38 34% 68% 70% 67% 64% 69% 70% 68% 30% 90% Other proved 9 4 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 10% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% Not proved 53 70 45 58 58 37 28 10 44 3 56% 30% 29% 32% 36% 31% 28% 32% 70% 7% Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%...

3. [2024] NZEmpC 157 Hall v Fire and Emergency New Zealand [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...grounds in a personal grievance, it cannot be the case that they are bound to pursue their grievance solely on the basis of those grounds. When parties obtain the assistance of an adviser, their understanding of the 7 Employment Relations Act, s 101(ab). 8 Section 101(a). 9 Shergold v Fieldway Medical Centre [2006] ICR 304 (UKEAT) at [27]. 10 Employment Relations Act, s 3(a)(ii). 11 See Shergold v Fieldway Medical Centre, above n 9, at [15]–[17] and [30]. 12 Creedy v...

4. Hunia v New Zealand Police [2021] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...information for any other purpose (a secondary purpose) if the agency believes on reasonable grounds that the use of the information for the secondary purpose is necessary to enable the agency to perform any of its functions. [21] The Police rely on IPP 10(1)(e)(i) and IPP 10(1)(f)(i) but the IPP 10 issues cannot be determined unless and until the s 57 issue has been resolved in favour of the plaintiff and the balance of the evidence heard by the Tribunal. [22] For present purposes the...

5. LCRO 136/2023 QT v MZ (8 January 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...9 [33] In reaching that decision the Committee determined, in summary, that: (a) provisions of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules) that were of potential application were rr 6, 10 and 10.1. (b) the complaint was partly that the respondent had been “generally dishonest or incompetent”; (c) the complaint was partly that the respondent had “bullied and harassed” the applicant and VN; (d) the applicant had never been...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 131 Young v Bay of Plenty DHB [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...of bankruptcy. [14] New Zealand bankruptcy law is largely codified in the Insolvency Act 2006. Section 76(1) provides that, upon an adjudication of bankruptcy, all proceedings to recover any debt provable in the bankruptcy are halted. Section 101(1) makes it clear that all property belonging to, or vesting in, the bankrupt, vests in the Official Assignee as do any powers that the bankrupt could have exercised in, over, or in respect of any property for the bankrupt’s own benefit...

7. IAA v Sparks [2013] NZIACDT 5 (07 February 2013) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...responsibility for engagement with their client, initiate the client relationship, and personally provide immigration advice. The exceptions to personal professional service delivery are limited to genuine clerical processes, and narrowly defined. [101] I am satisfied: [101.1] Mr Labendia initiated the professional relationship, and in doing so gave immigration advice in the sense of assisting Mr OBC in regard to an immigration matter. He was neither qualified nor entitled to do so...

8. BORA New Zealand Intelligence and Security Bill [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...specified in the warrant, owned or occupied by a person identified in the warrant, or where a person identified in the warrant is, or is likely to be, at any time 7 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J; see also Williams v Attorney-General [2007] NZCA 52. 8 ‘Any search is a significant invasion of personal freedom. How significant it is will depend on the circumstances. There may be...

9. Tait v Kruger - Tauarau Block (2021) 252 Waiariki MB 180 (252 WAR 180) [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...TAIT ON BEHALF OF THE TRUSTEES OF TAUARAU MĀORI RESERVATION Te Kaitono Applicant ME And TĀMATI KRUGER, HIAMOE WAAKA AND HINE KANE Ngā Kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing 2 December 2019, 225 Waiariki MB 101-111 5 October 2020, 242 Waiariki MB 36-41 (Heard at Whakatāne) Whakataunga: Judgment date 21 April 2021 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ C T COXHEAD Judgment of Judge C T Coxhead 252 Waiariki M...

10. LCRO 72/2022 ND v TC and MB ( [pdf, 244 KB]

    ...Following that, Ms ND attended at Mr SV’s office to sign the separation and relationship property agreement. [18] On that day (17 May), Mr MB sent the settlement statement to the purchaser’s solicitor. The statement included a credit of $101,161.04 for Mr RF’s equity in the property. [19] On the following day (the day of settlement) at 8:54 am, Mr MB sent an email to Mr SV and Mr HM as follows: Could … we please have a copy of the signed separation agreement and your...