Search Results

Search results for 101.

4502 items matching your search terms

  1. [2018] NZEmpC 101 Ovation New Zealand Ltd v The New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc [pdf, 322 KB]

    OVATION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED v THE NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS AND RELATED TRADES UNION INCORPORATED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 101 [6 September 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 101 EMPC 196/2018 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority AND THE MATTER of an application for leave to appear and be heard as an intervener BETWEEN OVATION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Plaintiff...

  2. Deputy Registrar v Trustees of Okahukura 8M2C2C2B Trust - Okahukura 8M2C2C2B Trust (2015) 337 Aotea MB 101 (337 AOT 101) [pdf, 188 KB]

    337 Aotea MB 101 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20140008517 A20130005100 UNDER Section 238 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahukura 8M2C2C2B Trust BETWEEN DEPUTY REGISTRAR Applicant TRUSTEES OF OKAHUKURA 8M2C2C2B TRUST Respondent Hearing: 331 Aotea MB 252-269 dated 18 December 2014 (Heard at Taumarunui) Date: 22 May 20...

  3. [2021] NZEmpC 101 A Labour Inspector v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant [pdf, 134 KB]

    A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v PRISHA’S HOSPITALITY (2017) LIMITED TRADING AS ROYAL CAMBRIDGE INDIAN RESTAURANT [2021] NZEmpC 101 [6 July 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 101 EMPC 450/2019 IN THE MATTER OF applications for the exercise of powers under Part 9A of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF...

  4. OJI-Fibre-Solutions-NZ-Limited-84-85-86-90-91-92-94-96-97-98-99-100-101-102.pdf [pdf, 181 KB]

    ...Limited v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-000098); (k) Beef & Lamb New Zealand Limited v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL- 000099); (l) Waikato and Waipa River Iwi v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-000100); (m) Auckland Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Council v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL000101); (n) Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated v WRC (ENV- 2020-AKL000102). 2. NATURE OF INTEREST 2.1 As the owner and operator of Kinleith Pulp and Paper Mill, Tokoroa. OjiFS is an entity with an interest in the proceedings th...

  5. Kupa v Kupa - Lot 10H and 101 Pt Omahu 2C1C (2020) 85 Takitimu MB 189 (85 TKT 189) [pdf, 251 KB]

    85 Tākitimu MB 189 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20200007366 WĀHANGA Under Section 214, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Lot 10H and 10I Pt Omahu 2C1C I WAENGA I A Between MARE REIHARANGI KUPA (SENIOR) Te Kaitono Applicant MARE REIHARANGI KUPA (JUNIOR) Te Kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing

  8. AEI and ZVN [2012] NZDT 273 (10 October 2012) [pdf, 46 KB]

    ...dispute, but has a limited jurisdiction to hear: claims founded on contract; or claims in tort in respect of the destruction or loss of any property, any damage or injury to any property and the recovery of any property (Disputes Tribunals Act 1988, s 10(1)) (a tort is a legal wrong not dependent on the existence of a contract, e.g. negligence). [4] The claim is not within the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. AEI and ZVN had no contract. AEI claims that ZVN’s negligence caused financia...

  9. Aitken v Laudermilk [pdf, 15 KB]

    SUMMARY Case: Aitken & Anor v Laudermilk & Ors – FINAL DECISION File No: TRI 2008-101-000098/ DBH 04231 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 22 July 2009 Background The Tribunal’s interim determination dealt with all matters except the allocation of liability for $25,362.35 incl. GST between the first, third and fourth respondents. The Laudermilks – First respondents The Tribunal held that it was reasonable for the Laudermilks to assume...

  10. The Kenneth Johnston Family Trust No.2 Trust & The Karlene Johnston Family No.2 Trust 156 [pdf, 602 KB]

    ...No.2 Trust & The Karlene Johnston Family No. 2 Trust wishes to be a party to an appeal by C N Barbour Family Trust ("Appellant") against part of a decision by Auckland Council ("Council") 1. We own the property and live at 101 Henwood Road Taupaki. The proposed changes to the alignments and status of the roads in the Redhills plan change unnecessarily place our property in the potential alignment of a future Arterial Road. 2. We are directly affected by the outc...