FT v NSC LCRO 261 / 2010 (21 October 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]
...inquiring. [37] This question was addressed in Auckland District Law Society v The New Zealand Law Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal and O HC Auckland, HC 237/94 and in 84/94, 27 April 1995, which considered the similar requirements of section 101(3)(a) of the Law Practitioners Act 1982. [38] In its decision, the Court criticised the Law Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal for paraphrasing words used in the Act. In its decision, the Tribunal had cited a passage from H (a law...