Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 190 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v Culturesafe NZ Ltd (in liq) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...804. 8 Garthwaite v Garthwaite [1964] P 356 (CA) at 387. 9 Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 47, [2007] 1 AC 521. 10 At [66]. 11 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v Culturesafe New Zealand Ltd [2019] NZERA 101 (Member Tetitaha). [27] Various procedural steps were taken thereafter. The main step was the resolution of an agreed preliminary question as to the scope of the Authority’s jurisdiction.12 [28] Earlier this year, an amend...

2. [2022] NZIACDT 28 - DD v Pabellon (15 November 2022) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 7 [30] There is a statement of reply (19 January 2022) from the complainant. He says it was obvious he was ineligible for the skilled migrant visa. The matter had cost him $8,775 in total, including a con...

3. Williams v Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc - Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc (2023) 295 Waiariki MB 97 (295 WAR 97) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...shareholders and the public, the law is silent as to whether Parliament intended that this should apply to the whole register or simply the personal information held about the person who is requesting access. The respondent claims 295 Waiariki MB 101 wording does not require that the whole register be made available, so their approach of providing an excerpt is in line with the legislative requirements. [18] The respondent submits that s 56 of the Privacy Act is a useful extr...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 077 Wellington Regional Council v Crosbie [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...unmeritorious point and failed; vi. whether any party has been required to prove facts which, in the Court’s opinion having heard the evidence, should have been admitted by other parties. 3 Goodwin v Wellington City Council [2021] NZEnvC 101 at [41]. 6 [15] The Regional Council submits that it was required to bring the enforcement proceedings against Ms Crosbie and Mr Page to ensure compliance with the resource consent and prevent the ongoing discharge of contamin...

5. [2023] NZIACDT 27 BT v Li (2 November 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 8 at [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 6 From the Registrar [23] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (29 September 2023), with supporting documents. From the complainant [24] There are no submissions from the...

6. OIA-106597.pdf [pdf, 899 KB]

   ...Forensic 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 142 123 127 213 123 109 140 174 154 150 197 232 208 229 188 208 Māori PM External Only 0 0 1 1 3 3 2 4 8 5 0 0 0 1 0 2 PM Immediate Full - Coronial 176 197 215 182 146 107 116 124 103 113 101 91 88 92 75 90 PM Immediate Full - Forensic 8 21 33 15 19 6 7 11 8 11 5 1 4 4 4 3 PM Immediate Lesser - Coronial 11 31 19 24 42 20 11 12 20 19 28 26 31 32 36 47 PM Immediate Lesser - Forensic 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1...

7. Ross v Edwards - Waikite 3A [2024] Māori Appellate Court MB 100 (2024 APPEAL 100) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...Judge M P Armstrong (Presiding) Judge A H C Warren Judge T K T A R Williams Whakataunga: Judgment date 22 May 2024 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā TE KOOTI Reserved Judgment of the Court 2024 Māori Appellate Court MB 101 Hei tīmatanga kōrero Introduction [1] On 5 April 2023, Judge Wara granted an injunction requiring Mr Ross to vacate Waikite 3A and to remove the buildings and his possessions from the land.1 [2] Mr Ross sought a rehearing of...

8. [2024] NZIACDT 18 – KL v Lawlor (24 May 2024) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 8 At [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 6 From the adviser [27] There are no submissions from Mr Lawlor. ASSESSMENT [28] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, pro...

9. 08042025-Immigration-Fiscal-Sustainability-and-System-Integrity-Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...circumstance that is unable to be dealt with under any other provision of the Act, any circumstance that is outside the Department’s control, or any circumstance that poses a challenge to the immigration system. 10 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 11 Ibid at [162] per Blanchard J. exploited workers. Safeguards already exist in the principal Act to ensure that the warrantless search power is not unreasonable.12 28. The i...

10. Judicial papers and speeches

    ...Employment Relations Conference, Auckland 5-6 March 2019. Employment Law Conference 2018 - Societal change and legal development Chief Judge Inglis’s speech to the NZLS Employment Law Conference 18 October 2018. Employment Court Workshop: Procedure 101 August and September 2018, A paper presented by Judge Corkill at a workshop held at Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch. The intersecting lines - Business interests and personal autonomy 12 September 2018, A paper prepared by Chief Judge Ingl...

    Located in:

    1. Employment Court >
    2. About the Employment Court