Search Results

1. BORA Advice Maritime Crimes Amendment Bill [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...Schreiber v Canada (Attorney-General) [1998] 1 SCR 841, [19]-[25] (expectation of privacy in overseas records) and R v Simmons [1988] 2 SCR 495, 528 (expectation of privacy in border searches). 4 [1997] 1 NZLR 399 (CA), 407. 5 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [172]. 4 3217771_ATTORNEY GENERAL - BORA VETTING ADVICE TO THE AG greater the justification required (and the greater the attendant safeguards required to ensure that the justification is present). 14....

2. 2016-17 Annual provisional suicide figures [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...European and Other Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate 2007/2008 21 5.93 87 15.39 24 9.05 408 13.26 2008/2009 10 2.82 95 16.81 26 9.81 400 13.00 2009/2010 22 6.21 105 18.58 31 11.69 383 12.45 2010/2011 19 5.36 101 17.87 22 8.30 416 13.52 2011/2012 19 5.36 132 23.34 31 11.69 365 11.24 2012/2013 28 7.90 105 18.58 24 9.05 384 12.48 2013/2014 22 4.67 108 18.06 26 8.81 373 12.96 2014/2015 16 3.40 130 21.74 27 9.15 391 13.58 2015...

3. Rua - Kotipu 2 (2003) 81 Ōpōtiki MB 35 (81 OPO 35) [pdf, 429 KB]

   ...trustees. The issue for the Court is whether I can remove the trustees and replace them with the Maori Trustee. BACKGROUND Kotipu 2 is a block of Maori freehold land situated on the Matahi Valley Road, near the village of Waimana. (See 89 Whakatane MB 101 & 86 Whakatane MB 261-262) The block comprises 42.8966 hectares and is subject to an ahu whenua trust, first constituted in 1991 when three trustees were appointed to administer the block. (See 84 Whakatane MB 2-3) The trustees ap...

4. Incorporated Societies Bill.pdf [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...search and seizure within the meaning of s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. 4 See, for example, McAlister v Air New Zealand [2009] NZSC 78; and Child Poverty Action Group v Attorney-General [2008] NZHRRT 31. 5 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 25. Ordinarily, a provision found to limit a particular right or freedom may nevertheless be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act if it can be considered reasonably justified in terms...

5. NZ BORA Advice: Land Transport Clean Vehicles Amendment Bill [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...of s 5 of the Bill of Rights Act.6 Whether a search will be reasonable turns on a 3 Proposed s 185 of the Land Transport Act 1998 (cl 7 of the Bill). 4 Proposed s 187 of the Land Transport Act 1998 (cl 7 of the Bill). 5 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 6 Ibid at [162], per Blanchard J. number of factors, including the nature of the place or object being searched, the degree of intrusion into personal privacy, and the rationale for the sear...

6. Hiroti - Succession to Rira Peti Hiroti (2021) 72 Te Waipounamu MB 271 (72 TWP 271) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...prepared by the Deputy Registrar for the hearing provided that the list of beneficiaries entitled to the SILNA land was updated by substituting Rira’s 1.388 share with David and Peihana, with both receiving a 0.694 share each. 5 108 Aotea MB 101-102 (108 AOT 101). 6 Above n 1. 7 133 Aotea MB 28-34 (133 AOT 28). 8 46 Te Waipounamu MB 250-267 (46 TWP 250). 72 Te Waipounamu MB 275 [19] Mr Hiroti opposed the draft orders set out in the submission provided by the Deputy...

7. [2022] NZEmpC 15 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...broader. I turn to set out my understanding of the relief that is sought on the current application and the reasons why Mr AlKazaz submits that recall/a rehearing is appropriate. 17 AlKazaz, above n 1. 18 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [2021] NZSC 101. 19 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd (No 10) [2021] NZEmpC 94. [19] Interlocutory judgment no 9 dismissed Mr AlKazaz’s application for a stay of the costs challenge and found that the company was entitled to costs on the appli...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 136 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...the information. Here, the information sought was intended to be confidential as between the employees involved and the University. It is personal information and, 8 Nel v ASB Bank Ltd [2017] NZEmpC 56, [2017] ERNZ 297 at [81]-[110]. 9 At [101]. in some if not all cases, will be sensitive for the employees involved. They will have assumed the information would be known only to a few people at the University. They certainly would not have expected Associate Professor...

9. NZBORA-Advice-Fair-Digital-News-Bargaining-Bill-for-publication.pdf [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...view that an NME provides material support to a designated terrorist entity, and that any decision not to register an applicant on that basis could be challenged by way of judicial review proceedings. 13 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 14 Ibid at [162] per Blanchard J. 15 Clause 77. presumed innocent requires that an individual must be proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt and that the state must bear the burden of pr...

10. [2023] NZIACDT 21 – WN v Lawlor (26 June 2023) [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...(1) In breach of cl 1, Mr Lawlor failed to be honest, professional and conduct himself in a timely manner to – (a) Ensure that the original documents were returned to the complainant upon his multiple requests 7 Z, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 7 (b) Refund to the complainant the fee for the unfiled partnership visa [31] The complainant terminated Mr Lawlor’s instructions to proceed on 13 April 2022. At the same time, he requested his original documents...