Search Results

1. Olsen v Vercoe - Matata Parish Lot 6A (2015) 116 Waiariki MB 63 (116 WAR 63) [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...Court and Council staff; (b) The proposed remuneration is a “one off” payment funded by the WDC; (c) The payment is reasonable and commensurate with trustees’ attendances; 4 115 Waiariki MB 101 (115 WAR 101). 116 Waiariki MB 66 (d) Approval is appropriate in terms of s 72 of the Trustee Act 1956; and (e) The terms of trust allow trustee remuneration where approved by the Court. [10] Evidence for the trustees was pro...

2. [2011] NZEmpC 160 Angus & McKean v Ports of Auckland Ltd [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...foregoing sources, we will refer to other relevant provisions of the principal Act to interpret the new sections. [8] As in V, we have had regard to the specific objects of the Act set out in s 3 which relate to both ss 103A and 125, and those in s 101 which relate to Part 9 of the Act containing both new sections. [9] In V we referred to what was then (and remains) the latest authoritative statement about the law of statutory interpretation, the judgment of the Supreme...

3. Pacey v Adlam - Matata Parish 39A2B2B2A and Matata 30A 2A (2016) 147 Waiariki MB 143 (147 WAR 143) [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...court to appoint the Māori trustee as responsible trustee for the trust, the Māori Appellate Court held that: 9 8 Taueki – Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Māori Reservation Trust (2012) 279 Aotea MB 101 (279 AOT 101). 9 Tito – Mangakahia 2B2 No 2A1A [2011] Maori Appellate Court MB 86 (2011 APPEAL 86). 147 Waiariki MB 150 [48] In Maxwell v Parata – Maruata 2B2 the Māori Appellate Court found that where there is no applicati...

4. Haira v Haira - Kapenga A7 (2016) 149 Waiariki MB 259 (149 WAR 259) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...Lot 39A Sec 2B No 2B No 2A Parish of Matata [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 59 (2015 APPEAL 59) 19 Short – Pukeroa Oruawhata Trust (1997) 1 Waiariki Appellate Court MB 86 (1 AP 86) 20 Taueki – Horowhenua (11) Lake (2012) 279 Aotea MB 101 (279 AOT 101) 149 Waiariki MB 267 original application to the Court was for the removal of a trustee under the Court’s trust powers, the power to issue a stay of execution cannot properly be interpreted as a part of the “powers and...

5. People charged and convicted of psychoactive substances offences December 2020 [xlsx, 96 KB]

   ...charges (from 56 to 37 charges). Number of charges Percentage of offence type total Offence type Charge outcome 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Sale and/or supply Convicted 8 32 159 109 122 101 84 73 73% 34% 68% 70% 67% 64% 69% 72% Other proved 1 9 4 2 2 0 0 1 9% 10% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Not proved 2 53 70 45 58 58 37 27 18% 56% 30% 29% 32% 36% 31% 26% Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% Total 11 94 233 156 182 159 121 1...

6. [2021] NZIACDT 4 - SL v Mackintosh (4 March 2021) [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 7 Section 50. 8 Section 51(1). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 10 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 9, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 15 ASSESSMENT [97] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with...

7. People charged and convicted of psychoactive substances offences December 2019 [xlsx, 216 KB]

   ...both the number and proportion of charges with 'not proved' outcomes decreased (from 19% to 14%). Offence type Charge outcome 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Sale and/or supply Convicted 8 32 159 109 122 101 85 73% 34% 68% 70% 67% 64% 70% Other proved 1 9 4 2 2 0 0 9% 10% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% Not proved 2 53 70 45 58 58 36 18% 56% 30% 29% 32% 36% 30% Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Total 11 94 233 156 182 159 121 100% 100% 100% 100% 1...

8. [2020] NZIACDT 21 - Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v Penty (18 May 2020) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...NZHC 376 at [93]. 10 Section 50. 11 Section 51(1). 12 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 13 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 12, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 12 and other documents had been developed for use with them. The contracts were also now issued in a way which significantly reduced the risk of a missing signature. [64] Ms Penty also sent to the Tribunal a st...

9. COVID-19 Alert Level 3 in the District Court data summary [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...29 29% 2 2% 06: Robbery, extortion and related offences 19 7 51% -8 -29% 07: Unlawful entry with intent/burglary, break and enter 124 9 8% 4 4% 08: Theft and related offences 340 -10 -3% -240 -41% 09: Fraud, deception and related offences 207 101 95% -4 -2% 10: Illicit drug offences 367 106 41% 107 41% 11: Prohibited and regulated weapons and explosives offences 155 45 41% 3 2% 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 161 56 54% 20 14% 13: Public order offences 110 32 40%...

10. [2022] NZIACDT 5 – LS v Murthy (4 April 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 8 Section 50. 9 Section 51(1). 10 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 11 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 10, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 [47] Ms Mortimer-Wang asks the Tribunal to take into account Ms Murthy’s health during this period, details of which are given. This affected her standard of care. A medical certificate (7 Decembe...